Kukard N.O and Others v ABSA Bank Limited and Others (Leave to appeal) (115284/2023) [2025] ZAGPPHC 146 (13 February 2025)
The court found that the applicants had raised grounds that warranted consideration by a higher court, particularly regarding the procedure for hearing exceptions and the issue of early discovery. The transcript revealed some ambiguity about whether the applicants had conceded that early discovery was unnecessary if the exceptions were upheld. Given these circumstances, leave to appeal was granted to the Full Court. Regarding the variation application, the court identified ambiguity in the original cost order and clarified that the costs of the fourth defendant for both the postponement application and the exception, including counsel on scale C, are to be paid by the first to fifth...
- Citation
- [2025] ZAGPPHC 146
- Parties
- Applicant: Colleen Michelle Kukard N.O.; Applicant: Hillbrow Inn (Pty) Ltd; Applicant: Joubert Park Maxime Hotel (Pty) Ltd; Applicant: Maxime Hotel (Pty) Ltd; Applicant: New World Hotels (Pty) Ltd; Applicant: Jeshco (Pty) Ltd; Applicant: Dream Weaver Trading 139 (Pty) Ltd; Applicant: Warwick Paul van den Berg N.O.; Applicant: Darryl Hurwitz N.O.; Respondent: ABSA Bank Limited; Respondent: Access Bank of South Africa Limited; Respondent: Standard Bank of South Africa Limited
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 13 February 2025
- Case Number
- 115284/2023
- Procedural Posture
- Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal and Variation of Order
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal is granted to the Full Court of this Division. The order of 23 October 2024 is varied to clarify the allocation of costs.
- Judges
- N.P. Mali
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal, Exception Procedure, Postponement Application, Costs Order, Variation of Order
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Colleen Michelle Kukard N.O.
Applicant
Hillbrow Inn (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Joubert Park Maxime Hotel (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Maxime Hotel (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
New World Hotels (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Jeshco (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Dream Weaver Trading 139 (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Warwick Paul van den Berg N.O.
Applicant
Darryl Hurwitz N.O.
Applicant
ABSA Bank Limited
Respondent
Access Bank of South Africa Limited
Respondent
Standard Bank of South Africa Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal and Variation of Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave to appeal should be granted against the refusal of postponement and upholding of exceptions.
- 2 Whether the original order contains ambiguity or error justifying variation under Rule 42(1)(c).
- 3 Whether the applicants were entitled to early discovery before exceptions were heard.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants had raised grounds that warranted consideration by a higher court, particularly regarding the procedure for hearing exceptions and the issue of early discovery. The transcript revealed some ambiguity about whether the applicants had conceded that early discovery was unnecessary if the exceptions were upheld. Given these circumstances, leave to appeal was granted to the Full Court. Regarding the variation application, the court identified ambiguity in the original cost order and clarified that the costs of the fourth defendant for both the postponement application and the exception, including counsel on scale C, are to be paid by the first to fifth...
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal is granted to the Full Court of this Division. The order of 23 October 2024 is varied to clarify the allocation of costs.
Orders
- Leave to appeal is granted to the Full Court of the Gauteng Division, Pretoria.
- The order of 23 October 2024 is varied as set out in paragraph 12 of this judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment