Kullman v Moloney and Others (2023/008569) [2023] ZAGPJHC 1290 (10 November 2023)

Kullman v Moloney and Others (2023/008569) [2023] ZAGPJHC 1290 (10 November 2023)

The court found that the applicant failed to provide reliable and contemporaneous valuations of his immovable and movable assets, relying instead on outdated and unsupported estimates. The absence of expert affidavits and contradictory statements regarding asset values undermined the credibility of the application. Furthermore, the applicant failed to disclose relevant information about creditors and related litigation, demonstrating a lack of utmost good faith. As a result, the applicant did not discharge the onus of proving advantage to creditors as required by Section 6 of the Insolvency Act, and the application for voluntary surrender was dismissed with costs.

Citation
[2023] ZAGPJHC 1290
Parties
Applicant: Conrad Kullman; Respondent: Sarah Jane Moloney; Respondent: Ann Clarissa Carsten; Respondent: Tsholofelo Maletsatsi Wesi; Respondent: Kim Kullman
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
10 November 2023
Case Number
2023/008569
Procedural Posture
Voluntary Sequestration Application / First Instance
Outcome
Application for voluntary surrender of the applicant's estate dismissed with costs.
Judges
Kaplan
Legal Topics
Voluntary Sequestration, Advantage to Creditors, Good Faith Requirement, Valuation of Assets
Civil Procedure Banking and Finance Voluntary Sequestration Advantage to Creditors Good Faith Requirement Valuation of Assets

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Conrad Kullman

Applicant

Sarah Jane Moloney

Respondent

Ann Clarissa Carsten

Respondent

Tsholofelo Maletsatsi Wesi

Respondent

Kim Kullman

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Voluntary Sequestration Application / First Instance

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has complied with the requirements of Section 4 and Section 6 of the Insolvency Act for voluntary surrender.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant has proved the value of his immovable and movable assets to establish advantage to creditors.
  3. 3 Whether the application was brought with the requisite utmost good faith.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant failed to provide reliable and contemporaneous valuations of his immovable and movable assets, relying instead on outdated and unsupported estimates. The absence of expert affidavits and contradictory statements regarding asset values undermined the credibility of the application. Furthermore, the applicant failed to disclose relevant information about creditors and related litigation, demonstrating a lack of utmost good faith. As a result, the applicant did not discharge the onus of proving advantage to creditors as required by Section 6 of the Insolvency Act, and the application for voluntary surrender was dismissed with costs.

Court Disposition

Application for voluntary surrender of the applicant's estate dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • The application for voluntary surrender of the applicant's estate is dismissed with costs.