Kumbe v Rustenburg Municipal Council and Others [2023] ZAGPPHC 479; 047351/20 (22 May 2023)
The court found that the Master of the High Court, who appoints trustees, is situated in Pretoria and that the Trust address is also in Pretoria. Although the majority of respondents and the applicant reside in the North West Province, the jurisdiction is determined by the location of the Master and the Trust. Section 21(2) of the Superior Court Act allows the Pretoria High Court to exercise jurisdiction over parties outside its area if joined to a cause within its jurisdiction. The respondents conceded that the Master in Pretoria makes the appointments based on recommendations from the Rustenburg Municipal Council. Therefore, the Pretoria High Court has jurisdiction to review the...
- Citation
- [2023] ZAGPPHC 479
- Parties
- Applicant: Kgomotso Kumbe; Respondent: Rustenburg Municipal Council; Respondent: Rustenburg Local Municipality; Respondent: Koketso Mogomotsi N.O (Council Speaker); Respondent: Frans Mabokela N.O (Municipal Manager); Respondent: Sheila Mabale-Huma N.O (Executive Mayor); Respondent: Rustenburg Water Services Trust; Respondent: Mokoka Edwin You N.O (Trustee); Respondent: Esmari Scheepers N.O (Trustee); Respondent: Brian Kagiso Lebethe N.O (Trustee); Respondent: Marks Kabelo Rapoo N.O (Trustee); Respondent: Priscillar Ngokwana Mayeza N.O (Trustee); Respondent: The Master of the High Court; Respondent: The Member of the Executive Council
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 22 May 2023
- Case Number
- 047351/20
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Jurisdictional Point in Limine and Preliminary Review
- Outcome
- The point in limine regarding lack of jurisdiction is dismissed. The parties are directed to approach the office of the Deputy Judge President for allocation.
- Judges
- K Mogale
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction of High Court, Review of Administrative Action, Appointment of Trustees
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kgomotso Kumbe
Applicant
Rustenburg Municipal Council
Respondent
Rustenburg Local Municipality
Respondent
Koketso Mogomotsi N.O (Council Speaker)
Respondent
Frans Mabokela N.O (Municipal Manager)
Respondent
Sheila Mabale-Huma N.O (Executive Mayor)
Respondent
Rustenburg Water Services Trust
Respondent
Mokoka Edwin You N.O (Trustee)
Respondent
Esmari Scheepers N.O (Trustee)
Respondent
Brian Kagiso Lebethe N.O (Trustee)
Respondent
Marks Kabelo Rapoo N.O (Trustee)
Respondent
Priscillar Ngokwana Mayeza N.O (Trustee)
Respondent
The Master of the High Court
Respondent
The Member of the Executive Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Jurisdictional Point in Limine and Preliminary Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Does the North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria, have jurisdiction to review the decision of the Rustenburg Municipal Council regarding trustee appointments?
- 2 Is the point in limine regarding lack of jurisdiction sustainable?
- 3 Does the location of the Trust and the Master of the High Court affect jurisdiction?
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Master of the High Court, who appoints trustees, is situated in Pretoria and that the Trust address is also in Pretoria. Although the majority of respondents and the applicant reside in the North West Province, the jurisdiction is determined by the location of the Master and the Trust. Section 21(2) of the Superior Court Act allows the Pretoria High Court to exercise jurisdiction over parties outside its area if joined to a cause within its jurisdiction. The respondents conceded that the Master in Pretoria makes the appointments based on recommendations from the Rustenburg Municipal Council. Therefore, the Pretoria High Court has jurisdiction to review the...
Court Disposition
The point in limine regarding lack of jurisdiction is dismissed. The parties are directed to approach the office of the Deputy Judge President for allocation.
Orders
- The point in limine is dismissed with costs.
- The parties must approach the office of the DJP of this Division for allocation.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment