Kunyuza and Another v Ace Wholesalers (Pty) Ltd and Others (JS27/12) [2015] ZALCJHB 54; [2015] 7 BLLR 683 (LC); (2015) 36 ILJ 1895 (LC) (24 February 2015)
Condonation for the late filing of the applicants' statement of claim is granted due to a bona fide mistake in service, swift action otherwise, and strong prospects of success in the main claim. The third respondent, Temba Big Save CC, must be joined as a party because, under section 197 of the LRA, the new employer is automatically substituted for the old employer and is jointly and severally liable for employment claims arising prior to transfer. The Constitutional Court's Intervalve judgment does not preclude joinder in the context of a section 197 transfer, as the transferee has a direct and substantial interest and must be held accountable. The facts are distinguishable from...
- Citation
- [2015] ZALCJHB 54
- Parties
- Applicant: Mlamli Kunyuza and Another; Respondent: Ace Wholesalers (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Big Save (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Temba Big Save CC
- Court
- Labour Court Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 24 February 2015
- Case Number
- JS27/12
- Procedural Posture
- Joinder Application / Application for Joinder and Condonation Prior to Trial
- Outcome
- Condonation granted for late filing; third respondent joined as party; costs reserved for trial.
- Judges
- Steenkamp
- Legal Topics
- Section 197 Transfer, Automatic Unfair Dismissal, Joinder of Parties, Condonation for Late Filing, Conciliation Precondition
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mlamli Kunyuza and Another
Applicant
Ace Wholesalers (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Big Save (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Temba Big Save CC
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Joinder Application / Application for Joinder and Condonation Prior to Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether condonation should be granted for the late filing of the applicants' statement of claim.
- 2 Whether the third respondent, Temba Big Save CC, should be joined as a party to the proceedings under section 197 of the LRA.
- 3 Whether the Constitutional Court's decision in Intervalve precludes joinder of a new employer not cited in conciliation.
Ratio Decidendi
Condonation for the late filing of the applicants' statement of claim is granted due to a bona fide mistake in service, swift action otherwise, and strong prospects of success in the main claim. The third respondent, Temba Big Save CC, must be joined as a party because, under section 197 of the LRA, the new employer is automatically substituted for the old employer and is jointly and severally liable for employment claims arising prior to transfer. The Constitutional Court's Intervalve judgment does not preclude joinder in the context of a section 197 transfer, as the transferee has a direct and substantial interest and must be held accountable. The facts are distinguishable from...
Court Disposition
Condonation granted for late filing; third respondent joined as party; costs reserved for trial.
Orders
- Condonation is granted for the late filing of the applicants' statement of claim.
- The third respondent, Temba Big Save CC, is joined as a party to these proceedings.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment