KwaZulu-Natal Consumer Protector and Another v Funnell Cars and Another (KZNCT1/2024) [2024] ZACONAF 2 (21 June 2024)
- Citation
- [2024] ZACONAF 2
- Status
- Order
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Court
- Consumer Affairs Court
- Panel
- B Dumisa, N Cawe, P Dabideen
- Case number
- KZNCT1/2024
More details
- Court
- Consumer Affairs Court
- Panel
- B Dumisa, N Cawe, P Dabideen
- Case number
- KZNCT1/2024
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The Tribunal found that the Defendants engaged in prohibited conduct by selling a defective vehicle to the Consumer and failing to provide the required Certificate of Roadworthiness. The Defendants acknowledged their conduct and agreed to refund the Consumer. The Tribunal accepted the settlement agreement reached between the parties, which provided for payment of R25,000 directly to the Consumer and R237,295.83 to Standard Bank, and made it an order of the Tribunal. The Tribunal held that the settlement was just and equitable, and that the Consumer would have no further claim against the Defendants upon compliance with the agreement.
Court disposition
Settlement agreement made an order of the Tribunal; Defendants to refund the Consumer as specified.
Orders
- The settlement agreement between the parties is made an order of the KwaZulu-Natal Consumer Tribunal.
- The Defendants must pay R25,000 directly to the Second Plaintiff's bank account.
- The Defendants must pay R237,295.83 directly to Standard Bank of South Africa by no later than 31 May 2024.
- Proof of payment must be provided to the First and Second Plaintiff.
- The Second Plaintiff shall have no further claim against the Defendants upon compliance.
- The Second Plaintiff may approach a competent court to enforce the agreement and seek interest at the prescribed rate if necessary.
02
Material facts
Parties
KwaZulu-Natal Consumer Protector
Applicant Counsel: Ryan MoodleyArishka Bhagothidin
ApplicantFunnell Cars
Respondent Counsel: Bradley FunnellBradley Funnell
RespondentAmounts and remedies
- Refund to Consumer: ZAR 25,000
- Payment to Standard Bank: ZAR 237,295.83
03
Procedural history
Posture
Settlement Order / Order Following Settlement Agreement
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the conduct of the Defendants constituted prohibited conduct under the Consumer Protection Act.
- 02
Whether the Consumer is entitled to a refund of the purchase price paid for the defective vehicle.
- 03
Whether the settlement agreement between the parties should be made an order of the Tribunal.
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The applicants argued that the Defendants sold a vehicle to the Consumer which was not mechanically sound and failed to provide a Certificate of Roadworthiness. The Consumer experienced significant defects, including a major oil leak and the need to replace tyres. The applicants sought a declaration of prohibited conduct, a refund of the purchase price, and further orders to prevent future inappropriate business conduct.
- Respondent
- The Defendants did not file an answering affidavit and did not contest the allegations. Prior to the hearing, the Defendants agreed to settle the matter and acknowledged prohibited conduct, undertaking to refund the Consumer as set out in the settlement agreement.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Section 55(2)(a)-(c), Section 56, Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008
A supplier must not engage in prohibited conduct and must ensure goods sold are of reasonable quality and fit for purpose.
- 02
Section 21, KwaZulu-Natal Consumer Protection Act 4 of 2013
The Tribunal may make any settlement agreement between parties an order of the Tribunal if it is just and equitable.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The Tribunal found that the Defendants engaged in prohibited conduct by selling a defective vehicle to the Consumer and failing to provide the required Certificate of Roadworthiness. The Defendants acknowledged their conduct and agreed to refund the Consumer. The Tribunal accepted the settlement agreement reached between the parties, which provided for payment of R25,000 directly to the Consumer and R237,295.83 to Standard Bank, and made it an order of the Tribunal. The Tribunal held that the settlement was just and equitable, and that the Consumer would have no further claim against the Defendants upon compliance with the agreement.
Obiter and limits
- The Tribunal commended the parties for resolving the dispute amicably and encouraged similar settlements in future consumer disputes.
- The Tribunal noted the importance of suppliers ensuring compliance with statutory obligations under the Consumer Protection Act.
Court disposition
Settlement agreement made an order of the Tribunal; Defendants to refund the Consumer as specified.
- The settlement agreement between the parties is made an order of the KwaZulu-Natal Consumer Tribunal.
- The Defendants must pay R25,000 directly to the Second Plaintiff's bank account.
- The Defendants must pay R237,295.83 directly to Standard Bank of South Africa by no later than 31 May 2024.
- Proof of payment must be provided to the First and Second Plaintiff.
- The Second Plaintiff shall have no further claim against the Defendants upon compliance.
- The Second Plaintiff may approach a competent court to enforce the agreement and seek interest at the prescribed rate if necessary.
Source and reliance status
Consumer Affairs Court
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Consumer Affairs Court
Order
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy
IN THE KWAZULU-NATAL
CONSUMER TRIBUNAL
HELD
IN DURBAN
Case number: KZNCT1/2024
In the matter between:
KWAZULU-NATAL
CONSUMER
PROTECTOR
FIRST PLAINTIFF
ARISHKA
BHAGOTHIDIN
SECOND
PLAINTIFF
(Name of the Consumer)
and
FUNNELL
CARS
FIRST
DEFENDANT
BRADLEY
FUNNELL
SECOND
DEFENDANT
Coram:
Prof. B Dumisa
Chairperson & Presiding Member
Ms. N. Cawe
Member
Mrs. P. Dabideen
Member
Date of Hearing
05 April 2024
Date of Settlement Order 21 June 2024
SETTLEMENT
ORDER
PLAINTIFFS
FIRST
PLAINTIFF
1. The First Plaintiff in this matter is the
OFFICE
OF THE KWAZULU-NATAL
CONSUMER PROTECTOR, established in terms of Section 5 of the KwaZulu-Natal Consumer Protector Act (the "Act") (hereinafter referred to as "the First Plaintiff'), with head Offices at 2[...] J[...] Street, Pietermaritzburg, in the Province of KwaZulu-Natal.
2. The Office of the KwaZulu-Natal Consumer Protector falls under the Department of Economic Development, Tourism and Environmental Affairs (EDTEA) in the Province of KwaZulu-Natal.
3. At the hearing, the First Plaintiff was represented by Mr Ryan Moodley, a Deputy Director in the Office of the KwaZulu-Natal Consumer Protector, in the employ of the First Plaintiff.
SECOND
PLAINTIFF
4. The Consumer, who is the Second Plaintiff in this matter is Ms
ARISHKA BHAGOTHIDIN, a major female who resides in Malvern, Ethekwini, in the Province of KwaZulu-Natal (hereinafter referred to as "the Second Plaintiff' or "the Consumer").
5. The Second Plaintiff lodged her complaint against the Defendants on the 30thof January 2024.
6. The Second Plaintiff deposed her Founding Affidavit, wherein she fully explained why this matter had to finally be adjudicated by the Tribunal.
7. At the Hearing, the Second Plaintiff represented herself.
DEFENDANTS
FIRST
DEFENDANT
8. The First Defendant in this matter is FUNNELL CARS, a company duly registered in terms of the company laws of the Republic of South Africa, with its principal place of business situated at 5[...] O[...] M[...] Road, Hillcrest, Ethekwini, in the Province of KwaZulu-Natal (the "First Defendant").
SECOND
DEFENDANT
9. The Second Defendant is BRADLEY FUNNELL, the owner/ manager of the First Defendent.
BACKGROUND
10. The Consumer, purchased a GOLF GTI 2010 from the Defendants who assured her that the vehicle was mechanically sound, though the Defendants told her that they were still waiting for its Certificate of Roadworthiness, COR. She soon discovered that the car had many defects:
10.1 It had a massive oil leak;
10.2 She even had to replace the tyres.
10.3 This was the reason the Consumer resorted to the KZN Consumer Protector's office for redress, who further investigated the matter and decided to refer it to the KZN Consumer Tribunal for adjudication.
APPLICATION
TYPE
AND
ORDER
SOUGHT
11. The KZN Consumer Tribunal (hereinafter referred to "the Tribunal") derives the jurisdiction for hearing this matter under Section 21 of the KwaZulu-Natal Consumer Protection Act, 4 of 2013 (the KZNCPA).
12. This matter will be heard in terms of Section 19(2)(a)(i) and Section 47(3) and Section 54 of the Consumer Protection Act, No 68 of 2008 (the "CPA").
13. The Consumer's prayers were for:
13.1 The Declaration of the Defendants conduct as prohibited conduct, and in contravention of Section 55(2)(a) to (c), and Section 56 of the Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008, the CPA;
13.2 Directing that the Defendants refund the Second Plaintiff the amount of R375 000.00 (THREE
HUNDRED AND SEVENTY FIVE RAND) being the total amount paid as the purchase price; .
13.3 To order the Defendant to pay all of the above payments within 15 days of the judgment.
13.4 Directing the Defendant to refrain from conducting future business in a manner that is inappropriate; and
13.5 Directing the Defendants, jointly and severally, the one paying the other to be absolved, to pay an administrative penalty in a sum still to be determined by the Consumer Tribunal and/or making any other appropriate order contemplated under Section 4(2)(b)(ii) of the CPA.
THE FIRST PLAINTIFF'S
EFFORTS
TO
RESOLVE THIS
COMPLAINT
14. The First Plaintiff tried to mediate this matter between the parties; the efforts to mediate proved fruitless.
SUMMONS
SERVED
ON THE
DEFENDANTS
15. On the 19th of March 2024, the Summons was served on the Defendants, indicating the KZN Consumer Tribunal Hearing set down date of the 5th of April 2024.
16. The Defendants did not file an answering affidavit
THE
HEARING
17. The matter was initially set down for hearing, on merits, on a default basis because the Respondent had failed to file an answering affidavit.
18. Before the hearing date, the First Plaintiff informed the Chairperson of the KZN Consumer Tribunal that the parties had decided to settle the matter; and are requesting the Tribunal to make their Settlement Agreement an Order of the KZN Consumer Tribunal.
19. The Settlement Order follows:
ORDER
20. The Settlement Agreement between the parties, on case number KZNCT01/2024, is hereby made an ORDER of this KwaZulu-Natal Consumer Tribunal. See Annexure A.
DATED ON THIS 21st DAY OF JUNE 2024
[Signed]
Prof B Dumisa
PRESIDING
TRIBUNAL
MEMBER
Ms. N. Cawe (Deputy Chairperson) and Mrs. P. Dabideen (Member) concurring
ANNEXURE
A
IN
THE KWAZULU NATAL
CONSUMER
TRIBUNAL HELD AT DURBAN
CASE NUMBER: KZNCT01/2024
THE KWAZULU-NATAL CONSUMER
PROTECTOR FIRST
PLAINTIFF
ARISHKA
BHAGOTHIDIN
SECOND PLAINTIFF
FUNNELL
CARS
FIRST DEFENDANT
BRADLEY
FUNNELL
SECOND DEFENDANT
SETTLEMENT
AGREEMENT
WHEREAS the consumer lodged a complaint with the Office of the Kwazulu Natal Consumer Protector in terms of the Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008 and the Kwazulu Natal Consumer Protection Act 04 of 2013.
AND WHEREAS the Office of the Consumer Protector KwaZulu Natal facilitated the handling of the complaint which was referred to the
KwaZulu Natal Consumer Tribunal.
1. The First and Second Defendant hereby acknowledges prohibited conduct on their part and considering such acknowledgement hereby undertakes to refund the Second Plaintiff as follows:
1.1 To pay the amount of R 25 000.00 (Twenty-Five Thousand Rand) directly to the Second Plaintiffs bank account;
1.2 To pay the full and total balance of R237 295.83 (Two Hundred and Thirty Seven Thousand Two Hundred Ninety-Five and Eighty Three Rand) directly to Standard Bank of South Africa by no later than the 31st of May 2024.
1.3 To provide proof of payment as set out in 1.1. and 1.2 above to the First and Second Plaintiff.
2. The abovementioned payment R 25 000.00 (Twenty- Five Thousand Rand) will be paid directly to the Second Plaintiffs bank account with details as follows: -
CAPITEC
BANK
ACCOUNT NUMBER: 2[…]
ACCOUNT HOLDER:
ARISHKA
BHAGOTHIDIN
3. The Second Plaintiff will have no other claim against the Defendant.
4. The parties agree that the Second Plaintiff shall approach any competent court to enforce this agreement which is made an order of the Consumer Tribunal and to further seek interest at the prescribed rate at the time of this agreement was made an order of the KwaZulu Natal Consumer Tribunal.
5. The parties further agree that the terms and conditions of this agreement will be made an order of the KwaZulu Natal Consumer Tribunal.
Dated at
DURBAN on this 5thday of April 2024.
First Plaintiff
Represented by Ryan Moodley
ARISHKA
BHAGOTHIDIN
BRADLEY FUNNELL
ON
BEHALF OF
FUNNELL
CARS
Second Plaintiff
First and Second Defendant
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.