Kwezi N.O and Others v Kupiso (2025/013976) [2025] ZAGPJHC 118 (17 February 2025)

Kwezi N.O and Others v Kupiso (2025/013976) [2025] ZAGPJHC 118 (17 February 2025)

The court found that the respondent had knowledge of the court order and its terms, and that his conduct in communicating with Masintinge Investments CC, banks, and the Master of the High Court constituted cooperation with third parties to the detriment of the Peaker Trust. The respondent's actions were deliberate and intended to undermine the Trust, utilising confidential information obtained during his tenure as trustee. The court rejected the respondent's defences as lacking merit and held that the applicants had proven all elements of contempt beyond a reasonable doubt. The urgency of the application was justified, as the applicants acted promptly upon discovering the respondent's...

Citation
[2025] ZAGPJHC 118
Parties
Applicant: Ntsikelelo Kwezi N O; Applicant: Bulelwa Jeanie Mkangisa N O; Applicant: Sibusiso Peter-Paul Ngwenya N O; Respondent: Odwa Bongile Kupiso
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
17 February 2025
Case Number
2025/013976
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Opposed Urgent Application for Contempt of Court Order
Outcome
Application granted. The respondent is held in contempt of the court order dated 19 November 2024.
Judges
Adams
Legal Topics
Contempt of Court, Urgent Application, Trustee Duties, Breach of Court Order
Civil Procedure Contempt of Court Urgent Application Trustee Duties Breach of Court Order

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ntsikelelo Kwezi N O

Applicant

Bulelwa Jeanie Mkangisa N O

Applicant

Sibusiso Peter-Paul Ngwenya N O

Applicant

Odwa Bongile Kupiso

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Urgent Application / Opposed Urgent Application for Contempt of Court Order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the respondent acted in contempt of the court order dated 19 November 2024 by cooperating with third parties to the detriment of the Peaker Trust and divulging confidential information.
  2. 2 Whether the application should be heard as a matter of urgency.
  3. 3 Whether the applicants have proven the elements of contempt of court beyond a reasonable doubt.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the respondent had knowledge of the court order and its terms, and that his conduct in communicating with Masintinge Investments CC, banks, and the Master of the High Court constituted cooperation with third parties to the detriment of the Peaker Trust. The respondent's actions were deliberate and intended to undermine the Trust, utilising confidential information obtained during his tenure as trustee. The court rejected the respondent's defences as lacking merit and held that the applicants had proven all elements of contempt beyond a reasonable doubt. The urgency of the application was justified, as the applicants acted promptly upon discovering the respondent's...

Court Disposition

Application granted. The respondent is held in contempt of the court order dated 19 November 2024.

Orders

  • The applicants’ non-compliance with the Uniform Rules of Court relating to form, service and prescribed time periods is condoned and the matter is heard as one of urgency.
  • The respondent is held to be in contempt of the order of this Court granted under case number 2024-130701 on 19 November 2024.