Kylie v Commission For Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration and Others (C52/07) [2008] ZALCCT 14 (31 July 2008)
The Labour Court held that the applicant, a sex worker dismissed from employment in a brothel, cannot enforce the statutory right to fair dismissal under the Labour Relations Act (LRA) because the underlying employment relationship is prohibited by the Sexual Offences Act. The court reasoned that public policy and the rule of law preclude courts and tribunals from sanctioning or encouraging illegal activity by enforcing rights or contracts arising from such conduct. The constitutional right to fair labour practices in section 23 does not extend to sex workers or brothel keepers, either as a matter of interpretation or as a justified limitation under section 36 of the Constitution. The...
- Citation
- [2008] ZALCCT 14
- Parties
- Applicant: Kylie; Respondent: Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration; Respondent: Commissioner Bella Goldman N.O.; Respondent: Michelle van Zyl t/a Brigittes
- Court
- Labour Court Cape Town
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 31 July 2008
- Case Number
- C52/07
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Labour Court Review of CCMA Jurisdictional Ruling
- Outcome
- Application dismissed. The CCMA's ruling is substituted with a refusal of the applicant's claim for compensation.
- Judges
- Cheadle
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Statutory Interpretation, Illegality of Contract, Constitutional Limitation, Scope of Labour Rights, Public Policy
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kylie
Applicant
Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration
Respondent
Commissioner Bella Goldman N.O.
Respondent
Michelle van Zyl t/a Brigittes
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Labour Court Review of CCMA Jurisdictional Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a sex worker dismissed from employment in a brothel may enforce the statutory right to fair dismissal under the Labour Relations Act.
- 2 Whether the CCMA and Labour Court have jurisdiction to enforce labour rights for employment relationships prohibited by statute.
- 3 Whether the constitutional right to fair labour practices in section 23 extends to sex workers and brothel keepers.
Ratio Decidendi
The Labour Court held that the applicant, a sex worker dismissed from employment in a brothel, cannot enforce the statutory right to fair dismissal under the Labour Relations Act (LRA) because the underlying employment relationship is prohibited by the Sexual Offences Act. The court reasoned that public policy and the rule of law preclude courts and tribunals from sanctioning or encouraging illegal activity by enforcing rights or contracts arising from such conduct. The constitutional right to fair labour practices in section 23 does not extend to sex workers or brothel keepers, either as a matter of interpretation or as a justified limitation under section 36 of the Constitution. The...
Court Disposition
Application dismissed. The CCMA's ruling is substituted with a refusal of the applicant's claim for compensation.
Orders
- The applicant’s claim for 12 months’ compensation is refused.
- No order is made referring the matter back to the Commissioner.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment