L: L and Another v V: N (46539/2018) [2021] ZAGPJHC 513 (16 April 2021)
The court found that the applicants have provided a secure and stable environment for the minor child and that the second applicant has formed a meaningful parental bond with her. The respondent's opposition was acknowledged as beneficial, as it contributed to crafting an order that secures and encourages his future relationship with the child. The proposed draft order, agreed upon by the parties and supported by the social worker, was found to be in the best interests of the child. Accordingly, the relief sought by the applicants was granted, subject to the agreed access regime for the respondent.
- Citation
- [2021] ZAGPJHC 513
- Parties
- Applicant: L: L; Applicant: L: D; Respondent: V: N
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 16 April 2021
- Case Number
- 46539/2018
- Procedural Posture
- Family Application / Final Determination
- Outcome
- Application granted; parental responsibilities and rights assigned to the applicants, respondent's rights to care and guardianship terminated subject to exceptions, and access regime ordered.
- Judges
- R M Robinson
- Legal Topics
- Parental Responsibilities and Rights, Termination of Guardianship, Best Interests of Child, Children S Act, Care and Contact
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
L: L
Applicant
L: D
Applicant
V: N
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Family Application / Final Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants should be granted full parental responsibilities and rights over the minor child.
- 2 Whether the respondent's parental rights pertaining to care and guardianship should be terminated, subject to exceptions.
- 3 Whether the proposed access regime for the respondent is in the best interests of the child.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants have provided a secure and stable environment for the minor child and that the second applicant has formed a meaningful parental bond with her. The respondent's opposition was acknowledged as beneficial, as it contributed to crafting an order that secures and encourages his future relationship with the child. The proposed draft order, agreed upon by the parties and supported by the social worker, was found to be in the best interests of the child. Accordingly, the relief sought by the applicants was granted, subject to the agreed access regime for the respondent.
Court Disposition
Application granted; parental responsibilities and rights assigned to the applicants, respondent's rights to care and guardianship terminated subject to exceptions, and access regime ordered.
Orders
- Full parental responsibilities and rights pertaining to care, contact, guardianship, and maintenance of the minor child are granted to the applicants.
- The respondent's parental rights pertaining to care and guardianship are terminated, subject to specified exceptions.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment