South Africa Judgment

North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria

Laat Waai Slaghuis (Pty) Ltd v Dinner With Me (Pty) Ltd (10175/2020) [2021] ZAGPPHC 175 (9 March 2021)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The court found, after considering the arguments and grounds for leave to appeal, that there are reasonable prospects that another court might reach a different decision. Accordingly, leave to appeal to the full bench of the Division was granted.

Court disposition

Leave to appeal granted to the full bench of the Division. Costs in the cause.

Orders

  • The application for leave to appeal is granted to the full bench of this Division.
  • Costs in the cause.

02

Material facts

Parties

Laat Waai Slaghuis (Pty) Ltd

Applicant Counsel: Adv N G Louw

Dinner With Me (Pty) Ltd

Respondent Counsel: Adv. M. Joubert

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal to the Full Bench

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The Applicant contended that there is a likelihood that a different court will come to a different conclusion, as set out in the notice of motion for leave to appeal.
Respondent
The Respondent argued that the application for leave to appeal is without merit, asserting that there is a bona fide dispute of fact and no reasonable prospects of success.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Section 17(1)(a) of the Superior Courts Act 10 of 2013

    Leave to appeal should be granted where there are reasonable prospects that another court may come to a different decision.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court found, after considering the arguments and grounds for leave to appeal, that there are reasonable prospects that another court might reach a different decision. Accordingly, leave to appeal to the full bench of the Division was granted.

Court disposition

Leave to appeal granted to the full bench of the Division. Costs in the cause.

  • The application for leave to appeal is granted to the full bench of this Division.
  • Costs in the cause.

Source and reliance status

North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria

Judgment

[2021] ZAGPPHC 175

IN

THE HIGH

COURT OF SOUTH

AFRICA

GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA

CASE NO: 10175/2020

NOT

REPORTABLE

NOT

OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES

NOT

REVISED

In the matter between:

LAAT WAAI SLAGHUIS (PTY)

LTD

Applicant

(Reg No. 2013/199774/07)

And

DINNER WITH ME (PTY) LTD

Respondent

(Reg No. 2016/182424/07)

JUDGMENT l.R.O LEAVE

TO APPEAL

MOTHA AJ

1. This is an application for leave to appeal my judgment handed down on 18 January 2021. The Application is premised on the reasons set out in the notice of motion for leave to appeal. It would be idle of me to repeat them. The Applicant's Counsel contended that there is a likelihood that a different Court will come to a different conclusion. The Respondent's Counsel submitted that this Application is without merit as there is a bonafide dispute of fact.

2. Having listened to the arguments presented by both Counsels and upon due consideration of the issues raised in the grounds for leave to appeal, I came to the conclusion that there are reasonable prospects that another Court might come to a different decision to that reached by this Court.

Conclusion

3. In the result I make the following order:

1. The Application for leave to appeal is granted to the full bench of this Division.

2. Costs in the cause.

MOTHA

J

ACTING

JUDGE OF THE

HIGH COURT

GAUTENG DIVISION OF THE HIGH COURT,

PRETORIA

Date of hearing: 04 March 2021

Date of judgment: 09 March 2021

Delivered: This judgement was prepared and authored by the Judge whose name is reflected and is handed down electronically by circulation to the parties/their legal representatives by email and by uploading it to the electronic file of this matter on CaseLines. The date for hand-down is deemed to be 09 March 2021.

Appearances:

For the Applicant: Adv N G Louw

(Instructed by Strydom & Bredenkamp Inc.)

For the Respondent: Adv. M. Joubert

(Instructed by Ettiene Loots Attorneys)

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Superior Courts Act 10 of 2013

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.