Lakes Hotel and Conference (Pty) Ltd v Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA) and Others (J 468/2020) [2024] ZALCJHB 144 (27 March 2024)
The court held that the order issued was an interim order, merely staying execution pending the outcome of a review application. It did not finally decide the merits of the review application or the respondent's submissions regarding its status. As such, the order is not a final judgment or order and is therefore...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] ZALCJHB 144
- Parties
- Applicant: Lakes Hotel and Conference (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA); Respondent: Aubrey Motebang Mokoena N.O; Respondent: Matebese Mathews Dikgale; Respondent: The Sheriff Benoni
- Court
- Labour Court Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Case Number
- J 468/2020
- Procedural Posture
- Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Interim Order
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed.
- Judges
- Prinsloo
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal, Final Vs Interim Orders, Stay of Execution
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lakes Hotel and Conference (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA)
Respondent
Aubrey Motebang Mokoena N.O
Respondent
Matebese Mathews Dikgale
Respondent
The Sheriff Benoni
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Interim Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the interim order staying the writ of execution is appealable under section 166(1) of the Labour Relations Act.
- 2 Whether the application for leave to appeal was filed within the prescribed time period.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the order issued was an interim order, merely staying execution pending the outcome of a review application. It did not finally decide the merits of the review application or the respondent's submissions regarding its status. As such, the order is not a final judgment or order and is therefore not appealable under section 166(1) of the Labour Relations Act. The application for leave to appeal was dismissed as the statutory requirements for appealability were not met.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed.
Orders
- The application for leave to appeal is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
37 paragraphs
THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG
Not Reportable
Case no: J 468/2020
In the matter between:
THE LAKES HOTEL AND CONFERENCE (PTY) LTD
Applicant
and
COMMISSION FOR CONCILIATION, MEDIATION
AND ARBITRATION (CCMA)
First Respondent
AUBREY MOTEBANG MOKOENA N.O Second Respondent
MATEBESE MATHEWS DIKGALE Third Respondent
THE SHERRIF BENONI
Fourth
Respondent
Decided: In Chambers
Delivered: 27 March 2024
This judgment was handed down electronically by circulation to the parties' representatives by email. The date for hand-down is deemed
to be on 27 March 2024
JUDGMENT: APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL
PRINSLOO, J
[1] On 19 December 2023 this Court issued an order staying the writ of execution obtained by the Third Respondent (Respondent) on 22 March 2022 and suspending the enforcement of the arbitration award, pending the outcome of the review application filed under case number JR 355/22.
[2] The Respondent subsequently requested written reasons for the order, which reasons were provided on 7 February 2024.
[3] Rule 30(3) of the Rules of the Labour Court (the Rules) provides that an application for leave to appeal is to be made within 10 days after the date on which reasons are given. In casu the reasons were given on 7 February 2024 and the prescribed 10 days to file an application for leave to appeal expired on 21 February 2024. The Respondent filed his submissions in terms of Rule 30(3A) on 13 March 2024.
[4] I have considered the grounds for appeal and the submissions made in support thereof and I do not intend to repeat those herein.
The test for leave to appeal
[5] It is trite that there is no automatic right of appeal against a judgment of the Labour Court. This much is clear from section 166(1)
of the Labour Relations Act[1] (LRA) which provides that any party to any proceedings before the Labour Court may apply for leave to appeal to the Labour Appeal Court against any final judgment or final order of the Labour Court. In order to be entitled to leave to appeal, an applicant in an application for leave to appeal must satisfy this Court that there is a reasonable prospect that another court could come to a different conclusion[2].
[6] Section 166(1) of the LRA makes it clear that only a final judgment or order is appealable.
[7] In casu an interim order was issued, which merely stayed execution pending the finalisation of a pending review application. Neither the merits of the review application nor any of the Respondent’s submissions regarding the status of the review application were not finally decided and no final judgment or order was granted. As a result, the provisions of section 166(1) do not apply and the order granted is not appealable.
[8] In the premises, the following order is made:
Order
1. The application for leave to appeal is dismissed.
Connie Prinsloo
Judge of the Labour Court of South Africa
[1] No. 66 of 1995, as amended.
[2] See: Woolworths Ltd v Matthews [1999] 3 BLLR 288 (LC).