Lakes Hotel and Conference (Pty) Ltd v Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration (J468/2020) [2023] ZALCJHB 350 (19 December 2023)
The court found that the applicant had furnished security as required by section 145(7) and (8) of the Labour Relations Act. By operation of law, this automatically suspended the operation and execution of the arbitration award pending the finalization of the review application. The sheriff and the Third Respondent acted contrary to the legal position by attempting to execute the award after security was furnished. The court exercised its discretion to stay the execution of the writ, as the review application was ripe for hearing and awaiting enrollment.
- Citation
- [2023] ZALCJHB 350
- Parties
- Applicant: THE LAKES HOTEL AND CONFERENCE (PTY) LTD; Respondent: COMMISSION FOR CONCILIATION, MEDIATION AND ARBITRATION (CCMA); Respondent: AUBREY MOTEBANG MOKOENA N.O; Respondent: MATEBESE MATHEWS DIKGALE; Respondent: THE SHERRIF BENONI
- Court
- Labour Court Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 19 December 2023
- Case Number
- J468/2020
- Procedural Posture
- Stay Application / Urgent Application for Stay of Execution Pending Review
- Outcome
- The application to stay the writ of execution was granted. The execution of the writ is stayed pending the finalization of the applicant's review application.
- Judges
- Prinsloo
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Review of Arbitration Award, Security Pending Review, Constructive Dismissal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
THE LAKES HOTEL AND CONFERENCE (PTY) LTD
Applicant
COMMISSION FOR CONCILIATION, MEDIATION AND ARBITRATION (CCMA)
Respondent
AUBREY MOTEBANG MOKOENA N.O
Respondent
MATEBESE MATHEWS DIKGALE
Respondent
THE SHERRIF BENONI
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Urgent Application for Stay of Execution Pending Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the furnishing of security in terms of section 145(7) and (8) of the Labour Relations Act automatically suspends the operation and execution of an arbitration award pending review.
- 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to a stay of execution of the writ pending the finalization of the review application.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant had furnished security as required by section 145(7) and (8) of the Labour Relations Act. By operation of law, this automatically suspended the operation and execution of the arbitration award pending the finalization of the review application. The sheriff and the Third Respondent acted contrary to the legal position by attempting to execute the award after security was furnished. The court exercised its discretion to stay the execution of the writ, as the review application was ripe for hearing and awaiting enrollment.
Court Disposition
The application to stay the writ of execution was granted. The execution of the writ is stayed pending the finalization of the applicant's review application.
Orders
- The execution of the writ of attachment issued pursuant to the arbitration award is stayed pending the finalization of the review application under case number JR 355/22.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment