Lamola v Minister of Safety and Security (2007/26594) [2012] ZAGPJHC 120 (4 June 2012)

Lamola v Minister of Safety and Security (2007/26594) [2012] ZAGPJHC 120 (4 June 2012)

The court found that the plaintiff was unlawfully shot, arrested, detained, and maliciously prosecuted by police acting within the scope of their employment. The plaintiff's employment at the time of arrest was satisfactorily proven, and the subsequent inability to work was causally linked to the injuries sustained. Medical and actuarial evidence established the extent of physical and psychological harm, permanent disability, and diminished earning capacity. The court consolidated overlapping heads of damages and awarded compensation for general damages, future medical expenses, and both past and future loss of earnings. The quantum was determined with reference to comparable cases, but...

Citation
[2012] ZAGPJHC 120
Parties
Plaintiff: Michael Lamola; Defendant: Minister of Safety and Security
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
4 June 2012
Case Number
2007/26594
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Quantification of Damages Following Prior Finding of Liability
Outcome
Plaintiff's claim for damages is upheld. Defendant is ordered to pay the plaintiff the total sum awarded, together with interest and costs.
Judges
Sutherland
Legal Topics
Unlawful Arrest, Malicious Prosecution, Quantum of Damages, Personal Injury, Loss of Earning Capacity
Delict Civil Procedure Unlawful Arrest Malicious Prosecution Quantum of Damages Personal Injury Loss of Earning Capacity

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Michael Lamola

Plaintiff

Minister of Safety and Security

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Trial / Quantification of Damages Following Prior Finding of Liability

Legal Issues

  1. 1 What is the appropriate quantum of damages for the plaintiff arising from unlawful shooting, arrest, detention, and malicious prosecution.
  2. 2 Is the plaintiff entitled to compensation for past and future loss of earnings and earning capacity.
  3. 3 Are the claimed heads of damages overlapping and should they be consolidated for assessment.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff was unlawfully shot, arrested, detained, and maliciously prosecuted by police acting within the scope of their employment. The plaintiff's employment at the time of arrest was satisfactorily proven, and the subsequent inability to work was causally linked to the injuries sustained. Medical and actuarial evidence established the extent of physical and psychological harm, permanent disability, and diminished earning capacity. The court consolidated overlapping heads of damages and awarded compensation for general damages, future medical expenses, and both past and future loss of earnings. The quantum was determined with reference to comparable cases, but...

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's claim for damages is upheld. Defendant is ordered to pay the plaintiff the total sum awarded, together with interest and costs.

Orders

  • The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff the sum of R1,055,981.00, together with interest a tempore more from date of judgment until date of payment.
  • The defendant shall pay the plaintiff's costs, including the costs in respect of all experts who filed reports or testified and the costs of engaging interpreters.