Land & Agricultural Bank of the Republic of South Africa v Performing Farmers Lending Book of Gro Capital Financial Services (Pty) Ltd (72/LM/AUG11) [2011] ZACT 86 (25 October 2011)

Land & Agricultural Bank of the Republic of South Africa v Performing Farmers Lending Book of Gro Capital Financial Services (Pty) Ltd (72/LM/AUG11) [2011] ZACT 86 (25 October 2011)

The Tribunal found that the merger would not result in a substantial prevention or lessening of competition in the relevant agricultural finance market. The post-merger market share was low, and the market remained fragmented with sufficient alternative sources of finance. The vertical integration resulting from the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2011] ZACT 86
Parties
Applicant: Land and Agricultural Bank of the Republic of South Africa; Respondent: Performing Farmers Lending Book of Gro Capital Financial Services (Proprietary) Limited
Court
Competition Tribunal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Case Number
72/LM/AUG11
Procedural Posture
Merger Approval / Final Decision
Outcome
Merger approved unconditionally.
Judges
Norman Manoim, Yasmin Carrim, Takalani Madima
Legal Topics
Merger Control, Retail Agricultural Finance, Vertical Integration, Horizontal Overlap
Competition Law Banking and Finance Merger Control Retail Agricultural Finance Vertical Integration Horizontal Overlap

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Land and Agricultural Bank of the Republic of South Africa

Applicant

Performing Farmers Lending Book of Gro Capital Financial Services (Proprietary) Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Merger Approval / Final Decision

  1. 1 Whether the proposed merger would substantially prevent or lessen competition in the relevant agricultural finance market.
  2. 2 Whether the merger would result in any public interest concerns, including employment losses.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the merger would not result in a substantial prevention or lessening of competition in the relevant agricultural finance market. The post-merger market share was low, and the market remained fragmented with sufficient alternative sources of finance. The vertical integration resulting from the merger did not raise foreclosure concerns. No public interest issues, including employment losses, were identified. The Tribunal agreed with the Commission's assessment and approved the merger unconditionally.

Court Disposition

Merger approved unconditionally.

Orders

  • The large merger between Land and Agricultural Bank of the Republic of South Africa and the Performing Farmers Lending Book of Gro Capital Financial Services (Proprietary) Limited is approved unconditionally.