Land and Agricultural Development Bank of South Africa t/a The Land Bank v Twee Jonge Gezellen (Pty) Ltd and Another (19694/2008) [2010] ZAWCHC 145 (25 March 2010)

Land and Agricultural Development Bank of South Africa t/a The Land Bank v Twee Jonge Gezellen (Pty) Ltd and Another (19694/2008) [2010] ZAWCHC 145 (25 March 2010)

The court found that the respondents had abandoned most of their previous defences and now relied solely on a limited constitutional ground. After considering the arguments and the reasons set out in the original judgment, the court concluded that there were no reasonable prospects that another court would reach a...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2010] ZAWCHC 145
Parties
Applicant: Land and Agricultural Development Bank of South Africa t/a Land Bank; Respondent: Twee Jonge Gezellen (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Nicolas Charles Krone; Respondent: Minister of Justice & Constitutional Development
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Case Number
19694/2008
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeal or a Full Bench
Outcome
Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
Judges
Desai
Legal Topics
Provisional Sentence, Leave to Appeal, Constitutional Attack on Procedure
Civil Procedure Provisional Sentence Leave to Appeal Constitutional Attack on Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Land and Agricultural Development Bank of South Africa t/a Land Bank

Applicant

Twee Jonge Gezellen (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Nicolas Charles Krone

Respondent

Minister of Justice & Constitutional Development

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeal or a Full Bench

  1. 1 Whether there are reasonable prospects that another court would reach a different conclusion regarding the provisional sentence procedure.
  2. 2 Whether the constitutional attack on the provisional sentence procedure warrants leave to appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the respondents had abandoned most of their previous defences and now relied solely on a limited constitutional ground. After considering the arguments and the reasons set out in the original judgment, the court concluded that there were no reasonable prospects that another court would reach a different conclusion, even on the limited constitutional basis advanced. Accordingly, the application for leave to appeal was dismissed with costs.

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs.