Land and Agricultural Development Bank of South Africa v Performing Financial Products of the Debtors Book of Capital Harvest (Pty) Ltd (LM226Feb16) [2016] ZACT 21 (30 March 2016)
The Tribunal found that the proposed merger would result in a minimal increase in market share (approximately 1%) and that the merged entity would continue to face competition from other commercial banks and agricultural cooperatives. Customers and competitors did not raise concerns, and alternative funding sources...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2016] ZACT 21
- Parties
- Applicant: Land and Agricultural Development Bank of South Africa; Respondent: Performing Financial Products of the Debtors Book of Capital Harvest (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Case Number
- LM226Feb16
- Procedural Posture
- Merger Approval / Final Decision
- Outcome
- Merger approved unconditionally.
- Judges
- Norman Manoim, Medi Mokuena, Anton Roskam
- Legal Topics
- Merger Control, Market Share Accretion, Input Foreclosure, Customer Foreclosure, Public Interest, Agricultural Financing
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Land and Agricultural Development Bank of South Africa
Applicant
Performing Financial Products of the Debtors Book of Capital Harvest (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Merger Approval / Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposed merger would substantially prevent or lessen competition in the market for retail financing to the agricultural industry.
- 2 Whether the transaction raises any public interest concerns, including employment impact.
- 3 Whether there are any vertical or horizontal effects resulting from the merger.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the proposed merger would result in a minimal increase in market share (approximately 1%) and that the merged entity would continue to face competition from other commercial banks and agricultural cooperatives. Customers and competitors did not raise concerns, and alternative funding sources were available. The Commission's investigation revealed no likelihood of input or customer foreclosure, and the transaction would not adversely affect employment or other public interest factors. Accordingly, the Tribunal concluded that the merger was unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition or raise public interest concerns, and approved the transaction...
Court Disposition
Merger approved unconditionally.
Orders
- The proposed transaction is approved unconditionally.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
63 paragraphs
COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA
Case No: LM226Feb16
In the matter between:
LAND AND AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT
BANK OF SOUTH AFRICA
Primary Acquiring Firm
and
PERFORMING FINANCIAL PRODUCTS OF THE
DEBTORS BOOK OF CAPITAL HARVEST (Pty) Ltd
Primary Target Firm
Panel
: Norman Manoim (Presiding Member)
: Medi Mokuena (Tribunal Member)
: Anton Roskam (Tribunal Member)
Heard on
: 2 March 2016
Order Issued on
: 2 March 2016
Reasons Issued on : 30 March 2016
Reasons for Decision
Approval
[1] On 2 March 2016, the Competition Tribunal ("Tribunal") approved the merger between the Land and Agricultural Bank of South Africa and the Performing Financial Products of the Debtors Book of Capital Harvest (Pty) Ltd.
[2] The reasons for approving the proposed transaction follow.
Parties to proposed transaction
Primary acquiring firm
[3] The primary acquiring firm is Land and Agricultural Development Bank of South Africa ("the Land Bank"), an entity incorporated and governed through the Land and Agricultural Development Bank Act No. 15 of 2002 ("the Land Bank Act"). As such, it is not subject to control as envisaged in the Competition Act No. 89 of 1998 ("the Act").
[4] The Land Bank is a specialist agricultural bank which provides financial solutions to participants in the agriculture and rural
development sectors. It provides retail and wholesale finance and insurance to emerging and commercial farmers/clients.
Primary target firm
[5] The primary target firm is the Performing Financial Products of the Debtors' Book ("the Debtors' Book"), currently owned by Capital Harvest (Pty) Ltd ("Capital Harvest"), a firm incorporated in terms of the laws of South Africa.
[6] The Debtors' Book provides retail funds directly to agricultural clients who require such capital to fund farming and agro-processing
activities. The Debtors' Book does not control any firm.
Proposed transaction and rationale
[7] The Land Bank intends to acquire Capital Harvest's performing debtors' book which consists of the Sale Book Debts. Upon completion
of the proposed transaction, the Land Bank will own the Debtors' Book.
[8] The Land Bank submits that the proposed transaction will enable it to increase its capacity and better fulfill its developmental mandate, as set out in the Land and Agricultural Development Bank Act, No. 15 of 2002.
[9] The primary target firm submits that it wishes to exit the business as principal and move to the agency model.
Impact on competition
[10] During its investigation, the Commission identified a horizontal overlap in the downstream market for the provision of retail
financing to the agricultural industry in South Africa. In assessing this overlap, the Commission sought to determine the extent to which the merging parties would be able to unilaterally increase prices post-merger.
[11] The Commission found that the merged entity would have a post-merger market share accretion of approximately 1%. In addition, the Commission was of the view that the merged entity would continue to face competition from other commercial banks and agricultural
cooperatives.
[12] Furthermore, customers and competitors contacted by the Commission did not raise any concerns. Customers submitted that the proposed transaction was unlikely to have any negative impact on their business operations and that there were numerous other entities such as commercial banks, Industrial Development Cooperation ("JDC") and International Finance Cooperation ("IFC"), which also provide funding at competitive rates.
[13] Based on the market shares as well as the views of customers and competitors', the Commission was of the view that the proposed
transaction was unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in the national market for the provision of retail financing to the agricultural industry.
[14] The Commission also identified a potential vertical effect in the upstream market for the provision of wholesale financing to the agricultural industry.
[15] According to the Commission, the Land Bank provides Capital Harvest with wholesale agricultural funding which the Debtors Book on lends to farmers. However, given that it is the Land Bank's statutory mandate to ensure access to financial services by the commercial farming sector and agri-business, the Commission found that the Land Bank was unlikely to engage in input foreclosure. In addition, direct competitors of the Debtors Book were found to have alternative suppliers in the market.
[16] The Commission was also of the view that customer foreclosure was unlikely given that Capital Harvest only received wholesale funding from the Land Bank.
[17] The Commission therefore concluded that the proposed transaction was unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition.
[18] We concur with the Commission's conclusion that the proposed transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market.
Public interest
[19] The merging parties confirmed that the proposed transaction will not result in any adverse impact on employment.
[20] The proposed transaction further raised no other public interest concerns.
Conclusion
[21] In light of the above, we conclude that the proposed transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market. In addition no other public interest issues arise from the proposed transaction. Accordingly, we approve t e proposed transaction unconditionally.
30 March 2016
DATE
_______________________
Mr Norman Manoim
Ms Medi Mokuena and Mr Anton Roskam
Tribunal Researcher: Karissa Moothoo Padayachie
For the merging parties: ENSafrica
For the Commission: Maanda Lambani