Lanzerac Manor (Pty) Ltd. v De Vries and Others (689/93) [1995] ZASCA 117; [1995] 12 BLLR 1 (AD); (1996) 17 ILJ 11 (A) (28 September 1995)

Lanzerac Manor (Pty) Ltd. v De Vries and Others (689/93) [1995] ZASCA 117; [1995] 12 BLLR 1 (AD); (1996) 17 ILJ 11 (A) (28 September 1995)

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the retrenchment of the respondents constituted an unfair labour practice due to the appellant's failure to consult with the affected employees prior to their dismissal. The Court found that, regardless of the employees' probationary status, they were entitled to a fair procedure, which includes an opportunity to make representations regarding their selection for retrenchment. The appellant's reliance on the so-called 'Halcyon condition' was rejected, as it was not properly pleaded or substantiated in evidence. The Court emphasised that consultation is a relevant consideration in determining fairness, and the absence thereof rendered the retrenchment...

Citation
[1995] ZASCA 117
Parties
Appellant: Lanzerac Manor (Pty) Limited; Respondent: M De Vries; Respondent: S Anthony; Respondent: G Austin; Respondent: D Constable; Respondent: E Fortuin; Respondent: E Jacobs; Respondent: M Jacobs; Respondent: S Lucas; Respondent: C Nkasana; Respondent: S Ntwanti; Respondent: T Phato; Respondent: C Philander; Respondent: S Sishuba; Respondent: K Smith; Respondent: I Titus; Respondent: D Tukuwayo; Respondent: N Wilbrown
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
28 September 1995
Case Number
689/93
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Labour Appeal Court to Supreme Court of Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Judges
Joubert, Hefer, F H Grosskopf, Van Coller, Scott
Legal Topics
Unfair Dismissal, Retrenchment Procedure, Consultation Requirement, Probationary Employment
Labour Law Unfair Dismissal Retrenchment Procedure Consultation Requirement Probationary Employment

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Lanzerac Manor (Pty) Limited

Appellant

M De Vries

Respondent

S Anthony

Respondent

G Austin

Respondent

D Constable

Respondent

E Fortuin

Respondent

E Jacobs

Respondent

M Jacobs

Respondent

S Lucas

Respondent

C Nkasana

Respondent

S Ntwanti

Respondent

T Phato

Respondent

C Philander

Respondent

S Sishuba

Respondent

K Smith

Respondent

I Titus

Respondent

D Tukuwayo

Respondent

N Wilbrown

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Labour Appeal Court to Supreme Court of Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the retrenchment of the respondents constituted an unfair labour practice under the Labour Relations Act.
  2. 2 Whether the appellant was obliged to consult with employees prior to retrenchment.
  3. 3 Whether the status of the employees as temporary or probationary affected the requirement for fair procedure in retrenchment.

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the retrenchment of the respondents constituted an unfair labour practice due to the appellant's failure to consult with the affected employees prior to their dismissal. The Court found that, regardless of the employees' probationary status, they were entitled to a fair procedure, which includes an opportunity to make representations regarding their selection for retrenchment. The appellant's reliance on the so-called 'Halcyon condition' was rejected, as it was not properly pleaded or substantiated in evidence. The Court emphasised that consultation is a relevant consideration in determining fairness, and the absence thereof rendered the retrenchment...

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed.
  • The appellant is ordered to pay the respondents' costs of appeal.