Lebogo v Ladybug Consulting (Pty) Ltd and Another (15218-21) [2025] ZAGPPHC 461 (30 April 2025)

Lebogo v Ladybug Consulting (Pty) Ltd and Another (15218-21) [2025] ZAGPPHC 461 (30 April 2025)

The court found that the plaintiff's claim, arising from alleged breach of contract and referencing construction allowances and payment schedules, was not for a liquidated amount of money nor based on a liquid document. The sums claimed involved damages for completed work with defects, remedial expenses, and unauthorized withdrawals, which are not straightforward matters of calculation and require detailed enquiry into the nature and extent of services rendered. The court further held that the declaratory relief sought was incompetent in summary judgment proceedings. The defendants raised several defences, including jurisdiction, arbitration, and factual disputes regarding liability and...

Citation
[2025] ZAGPPHC 461
Parties
Applicant: Mpho Daniel Lebogo; Respondent: Ladybug Consulting (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Khanyisa Mdluli
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
30 April 2025
Case Number
15218-21
Procedural Posture
Summary Judgment Application / Opposed Summary Judgment Application After Exchange of Pleadings
Outcome
Application for summary judgment dismissed; defendants granted leave to defend.
Judges
Flatela Luleka
Legal Topics
Summary Judgment, Breach of Contract, Liquidated Claims, Declaratory Relief
Civil Procedure Commercial and Corporate Summary Judgment Breach of Contract Liquidated Claims Declaratory Relief

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mpho Daniel Lebogo

Applicant

Ladybug Consulting (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Khanyisa Mdluli

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Summary Judgment Application / Opposed Summary Judgment Application After Exchange of Pleadings

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff's claim qualifies for summary judgment under Rule 32 of the Uniform Rules of Court.
  2. 2 Whether the relief sought is for a liquidated amount or based on a liquid document.
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to a declaratory order in summary judgment proceedings.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff's claim, arising from alleged breach of contract and referencing construction allowances and payment schedules, was not for a liquidated amount of money nor based on a liquid document. The sums claimed involved damages for completed work with defects, remedial expenses, and unauthorized withdrawals, which are not straightforward matters of calculation and require detailed enquiry into the nature and extent of services rendered. The court further held that the declaratory relief sought was incompetent in summary judgment proceedings. The defendants raised several defences, including jurisdiction, arbitration, and factual disputes regarding liability and...

Court Disposition

Application for summary judgment dismissed; defendants granted leave to defend.

Orders

  • The application for summary judgment is dismissed.
  • The defendants are granted leave to defend the plaintiff's claim.