Ledwaba and Another v South African Football Association and Others (Leave to Appeal) (037446/2022) [2024] ZAGPPHC 1248 (5 December 2024)
The court found that, after considering the arguments and heads of argument, there is no reasonable prospect of success for the appeal and no compelling reason for another court to hear the matter. The issues raised do not present any important point of law or fact that would justify reconsideration. Accordingly, the application for leave to appeal was dismissed.
- Citation
- [2024] ZAGPPHC 1248
- Parties
- Applicant: Ledwaba Ria Ivy; Applicant: Mohlabeng Ngoako Solly; Respondent: South African Football Association; Respondent: Jordaan Danile Alexander; Respondent: The National Executive Committee of the South African Football Association; Respondent: The Governance Committee of the South African Football Association
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 5 December 2024
- Case Number
- 037446/2022
- Procedural Posture
- Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following Initial Judgment
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
- Judges
- Holland-Muter
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal, Reasonable Prospect of Success, Costs Award
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ledwaba Ria Ivy
Applicant
Mohlabeng Ngoako Solly
Applicant
South African Football Association
Respondent
Jordaan Danile Alexander
Respondent
The National Executive Committee of the South African Football Association
Respondent
The Governance Committee of the South African Football Association
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following Initial Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave to appeal should be granted under section 17(1) of the Superior Courts Act.
- 2 Whether there is a reasonable prospect of success on appeal.
- 3 Whether there are compelling reasons for another court to hear the appeal.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that, after considering the arguments and heads of argument, there is no reasonable prospect of success for the appeal and no compelling reason for another court to hear the matter. The issues raised do not present any important point of law or fact that would justify reconsideration. Accordingly, the application for leave to appeal was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs.
- Costs to include the cost of senior counsel and to be on Scale C.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment