Legau and Others v Mokhasi (6749/2007) [2008] ZAFSHC 74 (19 June 2008)
The application was dismissed because the applicants launched it prematurely, ignoring the respondent's written undertaking to hold the annual general meeting in March 2008. The evidence, including affidavits and correspondence, established that the meeting was held as promised. The applicants failed to deny this in their replying affidavit and did not exhaust internal remedies. The court found no basis to deviate from the general rule that costs follow the cause, and ordered the applicants to pay costs.
- Citation
- [2008] ZAFSHC 74
- Parties
- Applicant: Dalton Thulane Legau; Applicant: Tubatsi Shadrack Moloi; Applicant: Mho Johannes Mothijoa; Applicant: Ramaele Johannes Motaung; Applicant: Molahlehi Augustus Thoabala; Applicant: Seputswe Daniel Mofokeng; Applicant: Thabo Josias Mokoena; Applicant: Paulus Semola Moloi; Applicant: Petros Matjale Ntombela; Applicant: Pokane Elias Tshabalala; Applicant: Mike Mosiuwa Mofokeng; Respondent: Thabiso Moses Mokhasi
- Court
- Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 19 June 2008
- Case Number
- 6749/2007
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Final Judgment on Application
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs.
- Judges
- M B Molemela
- Legal Topics
- Internal Governance of Association, Annual General Meeting, Compliance With Constitution, Costs Order
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dalton Thulane Legau
Applicant
Tubatsi Shadrack Moloi
Applicant
Mho Johannes Mothijoa
Applicant
Ramaele Johannes Motaung
Applicant
Molahlehi Augustus Thoabala
Applicant
Seputswe Daniel Mofokeng
Applicant
Thabo Josias Mokoena
Applicant
Paulus Semola Moloi
Applicant
Petros Matjale Ntombela
Applicant
Pokane Elias Tshabalala
Applicant
Mike Mosiuwa Mofokeng
Applicant
Thabiso Moses Mokhasi
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Final Judgment on Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent failed to convene an annual general meeting as required by the Standard Constitution.
- 2 Whether the application was premature given the respondent's undertaking to hold the meeting.
- 3 Whether the applicants exhausted internal remedies before approaching the court.
Ratio Decidendi
The application was dismissed because the applicants launched it prematurely, ignoring the respondent's written undertaking to hold the annual general meeting in March 2008. The evidence, including affidavits and correspondence, established that the meeting was held as promised. The applicants failed to deny this in their replying affidavit and did not exhaust internal remedies. The court found no basis to deviate from the general rule that costs follow the cause, and ordered the applicants to pay costs.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The application is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment