Lejage and Others v Minister of Police (500/2015, 501-504/2015) [2017] ZANWHC 65 (31 August 2017)

Lejage and Others v Minister of Police (500/2015, 501-504/2015) [2017] ZANWHC 65 (31 August 2017)

The court found that the defendant failed to discharge the onus of proving that the arrests were lawful under section 40(1)(b) of the Criminal Procedure Act. The arresting officer's suspicion was not based on reasonable grounds, as the information from the plaintiffs and the bank official undermined the credibility of the complainant's allegations. The plaintiffs were authorised committee members and not flight risks, and the arresting officer had already secured the chequebook and keys, making further commission of the alleged offences unlikely. The evidence of the plaintiffs and the bank official was accepted, and the defendant's evidence was rejected where it conflicted. Consequently,...

Citation
[2017] ZANWHC 65
Parties
Plaintiff: Monageng Isaac Lejage; Plaintiff: Elizabeth Madinko Moloantoa; Plaintiff: Mamikie Maria Masigo; Plaintiff: Dikoba Suzan Baile; Plaintiff: Nnini Johanna Mautlwa; Defendant: Minister of Police
Court
North West High Court, Mafikeng
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
31 August 2017
Case Number
500/2015, 501-504/2015
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Merits Judgment After Consolidation and Separation of Quantum
Outcome
Judgment for the plaintiffs on the merits; defendant liable for damages to be proved.
Judges
J.H.F. Pistor
Legal Topics
Unlawful Arrest, Damages for Unlawful Detention, Onus of Proof, Section 40 Criminal Procedure Act, Absolution From the Instance

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Monageng Isaac Lejage

Plaintiff

Elizabeth Madinko Moloantoa

Plaintiff

Mamikie Maria Masigo

Plaintiff

Dikoba Suzan Baile

Plaintiff

Nnini Johanna Mautlwa

Plaintiff

Minister of Police

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Trial / Merits Judgment After Consolidation and Separation of Quantum

  1. 1 Whether the arrest and detention of the plaintiffs by the police was lawful under section 40(1)(b) of the Criminal Procedure Act.
  2. 2 Whether the defendant discharged the onus of proving the lawfulness of the arrest.
  3. 3 Whether the arresting officer formed a reasonable suspicion based on credible information.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the defendant failed to discharge the onus of proving that the arrests were lawful under section 40(1)(b) of the Criminal Procedure Act. The arresting officer's suspicion was not based on reasonable grounds, as the information from the plaintiffs and the bank official undermined the credibility of the complainant's allegations. The plaintiffs were authorised committee members and not flight risks, and the arresting officer had already secured the chequebook and keys, making further commission of the alleged offences unlikely. The evidence of the plaintiffs and the bank official was accepted, and the defendant's evidence was rejected where it conflicted. Consequently,...

Court Disposition

Judgment for the plaintiffs on the merits; defendant liable for damages to be proved.

Orders

  • The defendant shall be liable to pay to each plaintiff such amount as they may prove in respect of damages suffered due to unlawful arrest and detention from 1 April 2014 to 3 April 2014.
  • The defendant shall pay the costs of the action in respect of the merits of this consolidated action.