Lemmer v Borngraber NO and Others (3842/09) [2010] ZAWCHC 19 (18 February 2010)
The court found that the applicant had established a prima facie liquidated claim against the trust for R600,000, which originated from Mrs Borngraber's mortgage bond and was transferred to the trust. The trust's inability to repay the amount upon demand constituted an act of insolvency. The respondents' arguments did not sufficiently rebut the applicant's case, and the requirements of section 10 of the Insolvency Act were satisfied on the balance of probabilities. Accordingly, a provisional order of sequestration was warranted.
- Citation
- [2010] ZAWCHC 19
- Parties
- Applicant: Riana Lemmer; Respondent: Klaus Dieter Borngraber NO; Respondent: Heindre Keith Rademan NO; Respondent: Melissa Rademan NO
- Court
- Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 18 February 2010
- Case Number
- 3842/09
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Provisional Sequestration Application
- Outcome
- Provisional sequestration of the Klaus en Laureen Trust granted.
- Judges
- S J Koen
- Legal Topics
- Provisional Sequestration, Trust Property Control Act, Liquidated Claim, Act of Insolvency
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Riana Lemmer
Applicant
Klaus Dieter Borngraber NO
Respondent
Heindre Keith Rademan NO
Respondent
Melissa Rademan NO
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Provisional Sequestration Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has a liquidated claim against the trust.
- 2 Whether the trust has committed an act of insolvency or is insolvent.
- 3 Whether it is to the advantage of creditors that the trust be sequestrated.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant had established a prima facie liquidated claim against the trust for R600,000, which originated from Mrs Borngraber's mortgage bond and was transferred to the trust. The trust's inability to repay the amount upon demand constituted an act of insolvency. The respondents' arguments did not sufficiently rebut the applicant's case, and the requirements of section 10 of the Insolvency Act were satisfied on the balance of probabilities. Accordingly, a provisional order of sequestration was warranted.
Court Disposition
Provisional sequestration of the Klaus en Laureen Trust granted.
Orders
- The Klaus en Laureen Trust [Registration No: IT4023/2007] is placed under provisional sequestration in the hands of the Master of the High Court.
- A rule nisi is issued calling upon the Trust and all interested parties to appear before the court on 14 April 2010 to show cause why a final order of sequestration should not be granted.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment