Lempetje and Others v National Education, Health and Allied Workers Union - Free State ("NEHAWU") and Others (5526/2019) [2021] ZAFSHC 28 (8 February 2021)
The court found that the applicants, except for the first applicant whose appeal against expulsion was pending, failed to establish locus standi as they did not demonstrate a direct and substantial interest in the relief sought. The National Executive Committee of NEHAWU was a necessary party due to its constitutional powers, and failure to join it was fatal to the proceedings. On the merits, the court held that the Provincial Executive Committee was empowered by the NEHAWU constitution to convene the regional congress in the absence of a Regional Executive Committee, and that the majority of qualifying branches attended. The applicants' arguments regarding the lack of quorum and improper...
- Citation
- [2021] ZAFSHC 28
- Parties
- Applicant: Mokheseng Ernest Lempetje; Applicant: Lebohang Thakheli; Applicant: Makgauta Mohobeli; Applicant: Thabang Selaledi; Applicant: Sello Maliehe; Applicant: Phakamile Mxosana; Applicant: Tshepo Monoko; Applicant: Pakiso Thulo; Applicant: Brenda Lesenyeho; Applicant: Sello Rampaku; Applicant: Sello Pule; Applicant: Kesipile Mongana; Applicant: Wellington Mofokeng; Applicant: Thakane Moduka; Applicant: Thabang Lesia; Applicant: Khwasa Mothalosa; Applicant: Palesa Shai; Applicant: Nkalimeng Sekhobo; Applicant: Jane Mosime; Applicant: Thabo Makhooe; Applicant: Bukiwe Manxiwa; Respondent: National Education, Health and Allied Workers Union - Free State Province ("NEHAWU"); Respondent: Khotso Maema N.O; Respondent: Justice Sello N.O; Respondent: Mathang Nqoko; Respondent: Konstable Selebedi N.O; Respondent: Nteboheng Sekhonyana N.O
- Court
- Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 8 February 2021
- Case Number
- 5526/2019
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs.
- Judges
- N.M. MBHELE
- Legal Topics
- Trade Union Governance, Locus Standi, Joinder, Union Constitution Interpretation, Condonation, Strike Out Application
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mokheseng Ernest Lempetje
Applicant
Lebohang Thakheli
Applicant
Makgauta Mohobeli
Applicant
Thabang Selaledi
Applicant
Sello Maliehe
Applicant
Phakamile Mxosana
Applicant
Tshepo Monoko
Applicant
Pakiso Thulo
Applicant
Brenda Lesenyeho
Applicant
Sello Rampaku
Applicant
Sello Pule
Applicant
Kesipile Mongana
Applicant
Wellington Mofokeng
Applicant
Thakane Moduka
Applicant
Thabang Lesia
Applicant
Khwasa Mothalosa
Applicant
Palesa Shai
Applicant
Nkalimeng Sekhobo
Applicant
Jane Mosime
Applicant
Thabo Makhooe
Applicant
Bukiwe Manxiwa
Applicant
National Education, Health and Allied Workers Union - Free State Province ("NEHAWU")
Respondent
Khotso Maema N.O
Respondent
Justice Sello N.O
Respondent
Mathang Nqoko
Respondent
Konstable Selebedi N.O
Respondent
Nteboheng Sekhonyana N.O
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the elective congress convened by NEHAWU Central Western Region on 16 and 17 October 2019 was valid under the union's constitution.
- 2 Whether the applicants had locus standi to challenge the congress and its outcomes.
- 3 Whether the National Executive Committee of NEHAWU was a necessary party to the proceedings.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants, except for the first applicant whose appeal against expulsion was pending, failed to establish locus standi as they did not demonstrate a direct and substantial interest in the relief sought. The National Executive Committee of NEHAWU was a necessary party due to its constitutional powers, and failure to join it was fatal to the proceedings. On the merits, the court held that the Provincial Executive Committee was empowered by the NEHAWU constitution to convene the regional congress in the absence of a Regional Executive Committee, and that the majority of qualifying branches attended. The applicants' arguments regarding the lack of quorum and improper...
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The applicants’ application for condonation of the late filing of the heads of argument is granted.
- The respondents’ application for condonation of the late filing of the answering affidavit is granted.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment