Levay and Another v Van den Heever NO and Others, In re: Van den Heever NO and Others v Waterfall Trout Properties (Pty) Ltd (13 December 2017) (42283/2015) [2017] ZAGPJHC 425; 2018 (4) SA 473 (GJ) (13 December 2017)
The court held that both creditors and shareholders, including minority shareholders, have locus standi to intervene in a winding-up application to oppose it, without needing to show an additional legal or other interest. The intervening parties established that they are both creditors and shareholders of Waterfall Trout Properties (Pty) Ltd, as their payment to the trust account was contemplated by the agreements and constituted payment to Waterfall. The intervening parties' version was uncontested by the liquidators and Peters. Furthermore, the intervening parties demonstrated a prima facie defence to the liquidation application, including the prescription of the debt and the validity...
- Citation
- [2017] ZAGPJHC 425
- Parties
- Applicant: Tibor Levay; Applicant: Ibolja Kongo Levay; Respondent: Theodore Wilhelm van den Heever N.O.; Respondent: Gail Liyn Warricker N.O.; Respondent: Salim Ismail Ganie N.O.; Respondent: Waterfall Trout Properties (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 13 December 2017
- Case Number
- 42283/2015
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Application for Leave to Intervene in Liquidation Proceedings
- Outcome
- Application for leave to intervene granted.
- Judges
- Van der Berg
- Legal Topics
- Intervention in Liquidation, Locus Standi, Creditor Rights, Minority Shareholder Rights, Prescription of Debt
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tibor Levay
Applicant
Ibolja Kongo Levay
Applicant
Theodore Wilhelm van den Heever N.O.
Respondent
Gail Liyn Warricker N.O.
Respondent
Salim Ismail Ganie N.O.
Respondent
Waterfall Trout Properties (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Application for Leave to Intervene in Liquidation Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a creditor or minority shareholder has locus standi to intervene in a winding-up application in order to oppose it.
- 2 Whether the intervening parties are creditors and shareholders of Waterfall Trout Properties (Pty) Ltd.
- 3 Whether the intervening parties have a prima facie defence to the relief sought in the liquidation application, including prescription of the debt.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that both creditors and shareholders, including minority shareholders, have locus standi to intervene in a winding-up application to oppose it, without needing to show an additional legal or other interest. The intervening parties established that they are both creditors and shareholders of Waterfall Trout Properties (Pty) Ltd, as their payment to the trust account was contemplated by the agreements and constituted payment to Waterfall. The intervening parties' version was uncontested by the liquidators and Peters. Furthermore, the intervening parties demonstrated a prima facie defence to the liquidation application, including the prescription of the debt and the validity...
Court Disposition
Application for leave to intervene granted.
Orders
- The applicants in the application dated 16 March 2016 are granted leave to intervene in the application for liquidation of Waterfall Trout Properties (Pty) Ltd brought by the liquidators of Choice Decisions 212 (Pty) Ltd (in liquidation).
- Costs of the application will be costs in the liquidation application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment