Liberty Group Limited and Others v Tikka n Kebab CC t/a Ghazal Express and Another (038205/2023) [2024] ZAGPPHC 1020 (16 October 2024)
The plaintiffs failed to comply with the court order dated 22 November 2023, which required them to amend their particulars of claim within 20 days. By withdrawing their first notice of amendment after the expiry of the period and delivering a second notice outside the permitted timeframe, without seeking condonation, the plaintiffs took an irregular step. The court found that the plaintiffs' conduct amounted to non-compliance with the order and that the second notice of amendment constituted an irregular proceeding under Rule 30. The court granted the defendants' application, set aside the second notice of amendment, and afforded the plaintiffs a further 10 days to give notice of...
- Citation
- [2024] ZAGPPHC 1020
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Liberty Group Limited; Plaintiff: 2 Degrees Properties (Pty) Ltd; Plaintiff: Pareto Limited; Defendant: Tikka 'N Kebab CC t/a Ghazal Express; Defendant: Bhoupinder Grill
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 16 October 2024
- Case Number
- 038205/2023
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Procedure / Interlocutory Application Regarding Irregular Proceedings and Amendment of Particulars of Claim
- Outcome
- Defendants' application succeeds; plaintiffs' second notice of amendment is set aside as irregular. Plaintiffs are given 10 days to file a new notice of intention to amend. Failing compliance, defendants may apply to strike out the claim and obtain judgment with costs.
- Judges
- J.S. Nyathi
- Legal Topics
- Amendment of Pleadings, Irregular Proceedings, Court Order Compliance, Condonation, Rule 28, Rule 30
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Liberty Group Limited
Plaintiff
2 Degrees Properties (Pty) Ltd
Plaintiff
Pareto Limited
Plaintiff
Tikka 'N Kebab CC t/a Ghazal Express
Defendant
Bhoupinder Grill
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Procedure / Interlocutory Application Regarding Irregular Proceedings and Amendment of Particulars of Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiffs' delivery of a second notice of amendment outside the time period stipulated by the court order constitutes an irregular proceeding.
- 2 Whether the plaintiffs complied with the order of Naude AJ dated 22 November 2023 granting leave to amend within 20 days.
- 3 Whether the plaintiffs should have sought condonation for their delay in amending the particulars of claim.
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiffs failed to comply with the court order dated 22 November 2023, which required them to amend their particulars of claim within 20 days. By withdrawing their first notice of amendment after the expiry of the period and delivering a second notice outside the permitted timeframe, without seeking condonation, the plaintiffs took an irregular step. The court found that the plaintiffs' conduct amounted to non-compliance with the order and that the second notice of amendment constituted an irregular proceeding under Rule 30. The court granted the defendants' application, set aside the second notice of amendment, and afforded the plaintiffs a further 10 days to give notice of...
Court Disposition
Defendants' application succeeds; plaintiffs' second notice of amendment is set aside as irregular. Plaintiffs are given 10 days to file a new notice of intention to amend. Failing compliance, defendants may apply to strike out the claim and obtain judgment with costs.
Orders
- The defendant’s application succeeds.
- The delivery by plaintiffs of the notice of amendment dated 29 January 2024 is declared an irregular step and is set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment