L.L.N v T.C.N (Born M) (30669/2022) [2022] ZAGPPHC 598 (12 August 2022)

L.L.N v T.C.N (Born M) (30669/2022) [2022] ZAGPPHC 598 (12 August 2022)

The court found that the applicant is the primary caregiver and the children have expressed a clear wish to relocate with him to Algeria. The expert reports, accepted by both parties, confirm the children are happy and coping well in the applicant's care. The respondent's concerns about access in Algeria are mitigated by the possibility of enforcing the South African court order abroad and the High Court's continuing jurisdiction. The respondent has not substantively disputed the expert findings nor provided compelling reasons against relocation. The court concluded that the relocation is in the children's best interests, the applicant's reasons are bona fide and reasonable, and the...

Citation
[2022] ZAGPPHC 598
Parties
Applicant: L.L.N; Respondent: T.C.N (Born M)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
12 August 2022
Case Number
30669/2022
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Opposed Urgent Application for Leave to Relocate Minor Children and Compel Signature for Passports.
Outcome
Application granted. The applicant is permitted to relocate the minor children to Algeria and may sign passport documents if the respondent fails to do so.
Judges
Kubushi
Legal Topics
Children's Act Section 18, Relocation of Minor Children, Primary Residence Dispute, Passport Application, Best Interests of Child
Family and Children Children's Act Section 18 Relocation of Minor Children Primary Residence Dispute Passport Application Best Interests of Child

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

L.L.N

Applicant

T.C.N (Born M)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Urgent Application / Opposed Urgent Application for Leave to Relocate Minor Children and Compel Signature for Passports.

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be granted permission to relocate the minor children to Algeria.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent should be compelled to sign documents for the children's passports, or allow the applicant to sign in her stead.
  3. 3 Whether the respondent will be able to access the children in Algeria, given Algeria is not a signatory to the Hague Convention.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant is the primary caregiver and the children have expressed a clear wish to relocate with him to Algeria. The expert reports, accepted by both parties, confirm the children are happy and coping well in the applicant's care. The respondent's concerns about access in Algeria are mitigated by the possibility of enforcing the South African court order abroad and the High Court's continuing jurisdiction. The respondent has not substantively disputed the expert findings nor provided compelling reasons against relocation. The court concluded that the relocation is in the children's best interests, the applicant's reasons are bona fide and reasonable, and the...

Court Disposition

Application granted. The applicant is permitted to relocate the minor children to Algeria and may sign passport documents if the respondent fails to do so.

Orders

  • The Draft Order marked 'XX' is made an Order of Court.