L.M v D.J.S [2023] ZAGPPHC 107; 59537/2021 (8 February 2023)

L.M v D.J.S [2023] ZAGPPHC 107; 59537/2021 (8 February 2023)

The court found that the evidence established binding agreements between the parties regarding maintenance and the use of the motor vehicle. The provision of the motor vehicle was not a donation but formed part of the Respondent's maintenance obligations for the minor child. The Respondent tacitly accepted the Applicant's requests for increased maintenance, as evidenced by his conduct and payments. The Respondent's subsequent unilateral reduction of payments and attempt to deduct the vehicle instalment from maintenance were impermissible. The disputes of fact raised by the Respondent were not bona fide and were contradicted by objective evidence, including correspondence and payment...

Citation
[2023] ZAGPPHC 107
Parties
Applicant: L.M; Respondent: D.J.S
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
8 February 2023
Case Number
59537/2021
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / First Hearing; Interlocutory Relief and Partial Final Orders
Outcome
Application granted in part; maintenance and motor vehicle agreements enforced; contact rights referred to Family Advocate; costs awarded against Respondent.
Judges
SC Vivian
Legal Topics
Maintenance Agreement, Child Contact Rights, Tacit Contract, Executory Donation, Variation of Agreement
Family and Children Civil Procedure Maintenance Agreement Child Contact Rights Tacit Contract Executory Donation Variation of Agreement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

L.M

Applicant

D.J.S

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Urgent Application / First Hearing; Interlocutory Relief and Partial Final Orders

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the alleged agreements regarding maintenance and use of the motor vehicle are enforceable.
  2. 2 Whether the provision of the motor vehicle constitutes an executory donation or forms part of maintenance obligations.
  3. 3 Whether the Respondent tacitly agreed to increase maintenance payments.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the evidence established binding agreements between the parties regarding maintenance and the use of the motor vehicle. The provision of the motor vehicle was not a donation but formed part of the Respondent's maintenance obligations for the minor child. The Respondent tacitly accepted the Applicant's requests for increased maintenance, as evidenced by his conduct and payments. The Respondent's subsequent unilateral reduction of payments and attempt to deduct the vehicle instalment from maintenance were impermissible. The disputes of fact raised by the Respondent were not bona fide and were contradicted by objective evidence, including correspondence and payment...

Court Disposition

Application granted in part; maintenance and motor vehicle agreements enforced; contact rights referred to Family Advocate; costs awarded against Respondent.

Orders

  • The Respondent is ordered to take all steps necessary to ensure the Applicant has full use of the Suzuki D' Zire 2018 model motor vehicle.
  • The Respondent must make timeous payment of all instalments due to the finance provider and maintain adequate insurance for the motor vehicle.