Lodhi 5 Properties Investments CC and Others v Firstrand Bank Limited (170/2014) [2015] ZASCA 72; [2015] 3 All SA 32 (SCA) (22 May 2015)

Lodhi 5 Properties Investments CC and Others v Firstrand Bank Limited (170/2014) [2015] ZASCA 72; [2015] 3 All SA 32 (SCA) (22 May 2015)

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the winding up orders against Lodhi 4 and Lodhi 5 were correctly granted, as both entities were commercially insolvent and unable to pay their debts, evidenced by their financial statements and failure to respond to statutory demands. The court found that the bank had properly invoked the acceleration clause, making the debt immediately due and payable. The R5 million insurance payment did not discharge the debt, as a substantial balance remained outstanding. The court accepted the bank's concession that the amount awarded against Mr Lodhi should be reduced to the admitted outstanding capital sum, but held that he was liable for mora interest at the...

Citation
[2015] ZASCA 72
Parties
Appellant: Lodhi 5 Properties Investments CC; Appellant: Lodhi 4 Properties Investments (Pty) Ltd; Appellant: Muhammed Islam Lodhi; Respondent: Firstrand Bank Limited
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
22 May 2015
Case Number
170/2014
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Gauteng Division of the High Court, Pretoria
Outcome
Appeal dismissed except for reduction of amount awarded against Mr Lodhi; winding up orders confirmed.
Judges
Maya, Majiedt, Pillay, Mbha, Schoeman
Legal Topics
Interest Free Loans, Winding Up, Suretyship Liability, Mora Interest, Shariah Compliance, Restitution

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Lodhi 5 Properties Investments CC

Appellant

Lodhi 4 Properties Investments (Pty) Ltd

Appellant

Muhammed Islam Lodhi

Appellant

Firstrand Bank Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Gauteng Division of the High Court, Pretoria

  1. 1 Whether the winding up orders against Lodhi 4 and Lodhi 5 were correctly granted.
  2. 2 Whether the amount awarded against Mr Lodhi should be reduced to the admitted outstanding capital sum.
  3. 3 Whether Mr Lodhi is liable for interest on the reduced sum and, if so, from which date.

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the winding up orders against Lodhi 4 and Lodhi 5 were correctly granted, as both entities were commercially insolvent and unable to pay their debts, evidenced by their financial statements and failure to respond to statutory demands. The court found that the bank had properly invoked the acceleration clause, making the debt immediately due and payable. The R5 million insurance payment did not discharge the debt, as a substantial balance remained outstanding. The court accepted the bank's concession that the amount awarded against Mr Lodhi should be reduced to the admitted outstanding capital sum, but held that he was liable for mora interest at the...

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed except for reduction of amount awarded against Mr Lodhi; winding up orders confirmed.

Orders

  • Save to the extent below, the appeal is dismissed with costs, including the costs of two counsel.
  • Paragraphs 38 (i) and (ii) of the order of the court below are set aside and replaced with: 'Muhammad Islam Lodhi shall pay to the applicant R2 642 006.98 together with interest thereon at the rate of 15.5 per cent per annum as from 15 June 2012 to date of payment.'