Long v South African Breweries (Pty) Ltd and Others; Long v South African Breweries (Pty) Ltd and Others (CCT61/18) [2019] ZACC 7; (2019) 40 ILJ 965 (CC); 2019 (5) BCLR 609 (CC) ; [2019] 6 BLLR 515 (CC) (19 February 2019)
The Constitutional Court held that precautionary suspension does not require a pre-suspension hearing, provided the suspension is not punitive and is linked to a pending investigation. The Labour Court's finding that the suspension was precautionary and did not materially prejudice the applicant was upheld. The Court found no reasonable prospects of success on the merits and refused leave to appeal on those grounds. Regarding costs, the Court held that the Labour Court erred by applying the general rule that costs follow the result without considering fairness or the conduct of the parties, as required by section 162 of the LRA and established case law. The adverse costs order was set...
- Citation
- [2019] ZACC 7
- Parties
- Applicant: Allan Long; Respondent: South African Breweries (Pty) Limited; Respondent: Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration; Respondent: M Malusi Mbuli N.O.; Respondent: Dumisani Sonamzi N.O.
- Court
- Constitutional Court
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 19 February 2019
- Case Number
- CCT61/18
- Procedural Posture
- Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal and Appeal Against Costs Order From Labour Court
- Outcome
- Application for condonation granted; leave to appeal on the merits refused; leave to appeal against costs order granted; appeal against costs order upheld; costs order set aside; no order as to costs in either court.
- Judges
- Mogoeng, Basson, Cameron, Dlodlo, Froneman, Goliath, Khampepe, Mhlantla, Petse, Theron
- Legal Topics
- Precautionary Suspension, Fair Labour Practice, Costs in Labour Matters, Disciplinary Procedure, Judicial Discretion on Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Allan Long
Applicant
South African Breweries (Pty) Limited
Respondent
Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration
Respondent
M Malusi Mbuli N.O.
Respondent
Dumisani Sonamzi N.O.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal and Appeal Against Costs Order From Labour Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Is an employee entitled to a hearing prior to precautionary suspension?
- 2 Did the Labour Court err in substituting the arbitrator's award rather than remitting the matter?
- 3 Was the adverse costs order by the Labour Court justified in law and fairness?
Ratio Decidendi
The Constitutional Court held that precautionary suspension does not require a pre-suspension hearing, provided the suspension is not punitive and is linked to a pending investigation. The Labour Court's finding that the suspension was precautionary and did not materially prejudice the applicant was upheld. The Court found no reasonable prospects of success on the merits and refused leave to appeal on those grounds. Regarding costs, the Court held that the Labour Court erred by applying the general rule that costs follow the result without considering fairness or the conduct of the parties, as required by section 162 of the LRA and established case law. The adverse costs order was set...
Court Disposition
Application for condonation granted; leave to appeal on the merits refused; leave to appeal against costs order granted; appeal against costs order upheld; costs order set aside; no order as to costs in either court.
Orders
- The application for condonation is granted.
- Leave to appeal on the merits is refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment