Longfellow v BOE Trust Ltd NO and Others (13591/2008) [2010] ZAWCHC 117 (28 April 2010)
The court found that the applicant failed to prove, on a balance of probabilities, that the deceased intended the draft document to be her last will and testament. The circumstances indicated that the applicant initiated the drafting process without a clear request from the deceased, and the evidence suggested the document reflected the applicant's wishes rather than the deceased's. The court also found that the applicant may have unduly influenced the deceased, who was terminally ill and under medication at the relevant time. As a result, the application for condonation under section 2(3) of the Wills Act was refused, and the applicant was not declared competent to inherit under the...
- Citation
- [2010] ZAWCHC 117
- Parties
- Applicant: John Longfellow; Respondent: BOE Trust Limited N.O.; Respondent: Alan Theuns Christian de Klerk; Respondent: Michaela Brockman; Respondent: Michelle de Klerk; Respondent: The Master of the High Court (Cape Provincial Division)
- Court
- Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 28 April 2010
- Case Number
- 13591/2008
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Application for Condonation of Non Compliance With Wills Act and Ancillary Relief
- Outcome
- Application refused with costs.
- Judges
- E.D. Baartman
- Legal Topics
- Wills Act Section 2 3, Testamentary Intention, Undue Influence, Competency to Inherit, Costs Order, Condonation of Formal Defect
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Longfellow
Applicant
BOE Trust Limited N.O.
Respondent
Alan Theuns Christian de Klerk
Respondent
Michaela Brockman
Respondent
Michelle de Klerk
Respondent
The Master of the High Court (Cape Provincial Division)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Application for Condonation of Non Compliance With Wills Act and Ancillary Relief
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the draft document prepared by the applicant was intended by the deceased to be her last will and testament.
- 2 Whether the court should condone non-compliance with the formal requirements of the Wills Act under section 2(3).
- 3 Whether the applicant is competent to inherit under the draft will he prepared.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant failed to prove, on a balance of probabilities, that the deceased intended the draft document to be her last will and testament. The circumstances indicated that the applicant initiated the drafting process without a clear request from the deceased, and the evidence suggested the document reflected the applicant's wishes rather than the deceased's. The court also found that the applicant may have unduly influenced the deceased, who was terminally ill and under medication at the relevant time. As a result, the application for condonation under section 2(3) of the Wills Act was refused, and the applicant was not declared competent to inherit under the...
Court Disposition
Application refused with costs.
Orders
- The application is refused with costs, such costs to be paid from the estate of the late Jacqueline Susan Longfellow.
- In the event of the estate having insufficient funds to satisfy the costs order, the second and fourth respondents are ordered to pay the wasted costs occasioned by the postponement of the matter on 27 November 2009.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment