Longueira and Another v Bashir and Others (21623/13) [2015] ZAGPPHC 725 (15 May 2015)
The court found that the Applicants had complied with the cancellation procedure stipulated in the purchase agreement by placing the First Respondent on terms and giving seven days to remedy the breach. The First Respondent failed to provide a valid electrical compliance certificate and did not remedy the breach within the required period. The Applicants validly cancelled the agreement and were entitled to restitution of the purchase price, transfer costs, and municipal account payments. The court rejected the Respondents' version regarding the validity of the certificate and found no real dispute of fact. The Applicants were awarded party and party costs, but not attorney and client...
- Citation
- [2015] ZAGPPHC 725
- Parties
- Applicant: Rui Duarte Sousa Longueira; Applicant: Veronica Longueira; Respondent: Charlotte Catherina Bashir; Respondent: Corne Myles Attorneys; Respondent: Registrar of Deeds, Pretoria
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 15 May 2015
- Case Number
- 21623/13
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- Application granted. The cancellation of the purchase agreement is confirmed. The First Respondent is ordered to repay the purchase price and associated costs. Costs awarded on a party and party scale.
- Judges
- CA Da Silva
- Legal Topics
- Sale of Immovable Property, Contract Cancellation, Specific Performance, Transfer of Property, Electrical Compliance Certificate
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rui Duarte Sousa Longueira
Applicant
Veronica Longueira
Applicant
Charlotte Catherina Bashir
Respondent
Corne Myles Attorneys
Respondent
Registrar of Deeds, Pretoria
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Applicants validly cancelled the purchase agreement for the immovable property.
- 2 Whether the First Respondent breached the agreement by failing to provide a valid electrical compliance certificate.
- 3 Whether the Applicants are entitled to restitution of the purchase price and associated costs.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Applicants had complied with the cancellation procedure stipulated in the purchase agreement by placing the First Respondent on terms and giving seven days to remedy the breach. The First Respondent failed to provide a valid electrical compliance certificate and did not remedy the breach within the required period. The Applicants validly cancelled the agreement and were entitled to restitution of the purchase price, transfer costs, and municipal account payments. The court rejected the Respondents' version regarding the validity of the certificate and found no real dispute of fact. The Applicants were awarded party and party costs, but not attorney and client...
Court Disposition
Application granted. The cancellation of the purchase agreement is confirmed. The First Respondent is ordered to repay the purchase price and associated costs. Costs awarded on a party and party scale.
Orders
- The cancellation by the Applicants of the purchase agreement dated 21 May 2012 is confirmed.
- The First Respondent is ordered to repay the purchase price of R570,000.00 to the Applicants against delivery of the property.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment