Lonmin LTD and Others v C.G Steyn Inc t/a Steyn Attorneys and Others (M619/2016) [2018] ZANWHC 73 (13 December 2018)
The court found that its discretion to dismiss the application due to non-joinder was exercised judicially and in accordance with established legal principles. The applicants failed to join a substantial number of necessary parties, despite being made aware of this requirement, and their proposed timeframes for joinder were impractical. The withdrawal of certain prayers did not cure the defects in the application, and the matter was not ripe for determination. The punitive costs order was justified given the applicants' conduct and the history of the litigation. The applicants did not demonstrate reasonable prospects of success on appeal, and there were no grounds for interference with...
- Citation
- [2018] ZANWHC 73
- Parties
- Applicant: Lonmin LTD; Applicant: Anglo American Platinum LTD; Applicant: The Minister of Finance; Applicant: Q-Link (Pty) LTD; Respondent: C.G. Steyn Inc t/a Steyn Attorneys; Respondent: Emerald Dunes Investments 57 CC t/a Woza Cash; Respondent: Midnight Spark Trading 400 CC; Respondent: West Point Trading 13BK t/a Bapong Cash Loans; Respondent: Bitline SA 510 CC t/a Loan Tech Financial Services & Cash Card Salary Advance; Respondent: Holographix Properties 512 BK t/a Cash Box Financial Services; Respondent: Greenville Trading 7 BK t/a Platinum Cash Advance; Respondent: D EN AG Fourie BK t/a Cash For Cash 1, Cash For Cash 2, Tlayang Financial Service, City Financial Services, Lethabo Financial Services; Respondent: Eastern Blue Investments 186 BK t/a Fast Cash Financial Services; Respondent: Blue Raindrops Trading 59 CC t/a Ready Cash; Respondent: Eunever Trading 11CC t/a Sevco Finance; Respondent: Tuba Finance; Respondent: The Minister of Justice & Constitutional Development; Respondent: The Minister of Trade & Industry; Respondent: The National Credit Regulator; Respondent: Association for Debt Recovery Agents; Respondent: The Law Society of the Northern Provinces; Appellant: General Council of the Bar of South Africa; Appellant: Nedbank LTD
- Court
- North West High Court, Mafikeng
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 13 December 2018
- Case Number
- M619/2016
- Procedural Posture
- Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following Dismissal of Main Application and Costs Order
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
- Judges
- A.M. Kgoele
- Legal Topics
- Non Joinder, Judicial Discretion, Costs Orders, Declaratory Relief, National Credit Act, Public Interest Litigation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lonmin LTD
Applicant
Anglo American Platinum LTD
Applicant
The Minister of Finance
Applicant
Q-Link (Pty) LTD
Applicant
C.G. Steyn Inc t/a Steyn Attorneys
Respondent
Emerald Dunes Investments 57 CC t/a Woza Cash
Respondent
Midnight Spark Trading 400 CC
Respondent
West Point Trading 13BK t/a Bapong Cash Loans
Respondent
Bitline SA 510 CC t/a Loan Tech Financial Services & Cash Card Salary Advance
Respondent
Holographix Properties 512 BK t/a Cash Box Financial Services
Respondent
Greenville Trading 7 BK t/a Platinum Cash Advance
Respondent
D EN AG Fourie BK t/a Cash For Cash 1, Cash For Cash 2, Tlayang Financial Service, City Financial Services, Lethabo Financial Services
Respondent
Eastern Blue Investments 186 BK t/a Fast Cash Financial Services
Respondent
Blue Raindrops Trading 59 CC t/a Ready Cash
Respondent
Eunever Trading 11CC t/a Sevco Finance
Respondent
Tuba Finance
Respondent
The Minister of Justice & Constitutional Development
Respondent
The Minister of Trade & Industry
Respondent
The National Credit Regulator
Respondent
Association for Debt Recovery Agents
Respondent
The Law Society of the Northern Provinces
Respondent
General Council of the Bar of South Africa
Appellant
Nedbank LTD
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following Dismissal of Main Application and Costs Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court exercised its discretion judicially in dismissing the application due to non-joinder.
- 2 Whether the applicants have reasonable prospects of success on appeal.
- 3 Whether the punitive costs order was justified.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that its discretion to dismiss the application due to non-joinder was exercised judicially and in accordance with established legal principles. The applicants failed to join a substantial number of necessary parties, despite being made aware of this requirement, and their proposed timeframes for joinder were impractical. The withdrawal of certain prayers did not cure the defects in the application, and the matter was not ripe for determination. The punitive costs order was justified given the applicants' conduct and the history of the litigation. The applicants did not demonstrate reasonable prospects of success on appeal, and there were no grounds for interference with...
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The application for leave to appeal to the Full Bench of this Division or the Supreme Court of Appeal is dismissed with costs.
- Costs to include costs consequent upon the employment of two Counsel and/or a Senior Counsel where applicable.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment