Lourens v President van die Republiek van Suid Afrika en Andere (49807/09) [2010] ZAGPPHC 19; 2013 (1) SA 499 (GNP) (16 March 2010)
The court found that the national government has not fulfilled its constitutional obligation under section 6(4) of the Constitution to regulate and monitor its use of official languages through legislative and other measures. The evidence showed that while some steps had been taken, such as drafting policy frameworks and establishing translation services, there was no comprehensive set of legislative and other measures in place to regulate and monitor the use of official languages. The court held that it could not compel the government to enact a national language law, as the Constitution does not require such a law specifically, but it could issue a declaratory order and a mandatory...
- Citation
- [2010] ZAGPPHC 19
- Parties
- Applicant: Cornelus Johannes Alexander Lourens; Respondent: President van die Republiek van Suid Afrika; Respondent: Parlement van Suid-Afrika; Respondent: Minister van Kuns, Kultuur, Wetenskap en Tegnologie; Respondent: Minister van Justisie & Grondwetlike Ontwikkeling; Respondent: Pan Suid-Afrikaanse Taalraad
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 16 March 2010
- Case Number
- 49807/09
- Procedural Posture
- Constitutional Application / First Instance
- Outcome
- Application granted in part; declaratory and mandatory orders issued against the Minister of Arts and Culture; costs awarded to applicant against third respondent.
- Judges
- B.R. du Plessis
- Legal Topics
- Language Rights, Constitutional Obligations, Implementation of Statutory Duties, Separation of Powers, Declaratory Relief
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Cornelus Johannes Alexander Lourens
Applicant
President van die Republiek van Suid Afrika
Respondent
Parlement van Suid-Afrika
Respondent
Minister van Kuns, Kultuur, Wetenskap en Tegnologie
Respondent
Minister van Justisie & Grondwetlike Ontwikkeling
Respondent
Pan Suid-Afrikaanse Taalraad
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Application / First Instance
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the national government has complied with its constitutional obligations under section 6(4) of the Constitution to regulate and monitor its use of official languages through legislative and other measures.
- 2 Whether the President, relevant Ministers, or Parliament can be compelled to enact a national language law or take specific steps regarding language policy.
- 3 Whether the Parliament is obliged to publish all legislation in all official languages.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the national government has not fulfilled its constitutional obligation under section 6(4) of the Constitution to regulate and monitor its use of official languages through legislative and other measures. The evidence showed that while some steps had been taken, such as drafting policy frameworks and establishing translation services, there was no comprehensive set of legislative and other measures in place to regulate and monitor the use of official languages. The court held that it could not compel the government to enact a national language law, as the Constitution does not require such a law specifically, but it could issue a declaratory order and a mandatory...
Court Disposition
Application granted in part; declaratory and mandatory orders issued against the Minister of Arts and Culture; costs awarded to applicant against third respondent.
Orders
- It is declared that the national government is in breach of its obligation under section 6(4) of the Constitution to regulate and monitor its use of official languages through legislative and other measures.
- The national Minister of Arts and Culture, Science and Technology, in her capacity as the responsible member of the executive, is ordered to comply with the said obligation within two years from the date of this order or to ensure compliance.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment