Louw and Others v Absa Trust Limited and Others (19085/2007) [2014] ZAWCHC 159 (28 October 2014)

Louw and Others v Absa Trust Limited and Others (19085/2007) [2014] ZAWCHC 159 (28 October 2014)

The court found that the sale of Erf 1604 in 1987 constituted a breach of trust, as it was effected for the benefit of an income beneficiary and disregarded the interests of the capital beneficiaries. However, the party responsible for the breach was Volkskastrust Limited, acting as agent for Volkskas Limited, the appointed trustee. Absa Trust Limited, although it succeeded Volkskastrust Limited in administering the trust, did not assume its delictual liabilities. Statutory amalgamation transferred such liabilities to Absa Bank Limited, not Absa Trust Limited. The representations made by Absa Trust Limited to the plaintiffs were limited to administrative succession and did not amount to...

Citation
[2014] ZAWCHC 159
Parties
Plaintiff: Martin Ricciardi N.O.; Plaintiff: Ismail Shaik Hassan Parker N.O.; Plaintiff: Werner Francis Louw; Plaintiff: Wilhelm Jacques Louw; Defendant: Absa Trust Limited; Defendant: And Four Others
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
28 October 2014
Case Number
19085/2007
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Final Judgment
Outcome
Action dismissed with costs, including costs of two counsel.
Judges
Binns-Ward
Legal Topics
Testamentary Trusts, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Successor Liability, Prescription, Estoppel, Distribution of Trust Assets

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Martin Ricciardi N.O.

Plaintiff

Ismail Shaik Hassan Parker N.O.

Plaintiff

Werner Francis Louw

Plaintiff

Wilhelm Jacques Louw

Plaintiff

Absa Trust Limited

Defendant

And Four Others

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Trial / Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the sale of Erf 1604 in 1987 by the trustee constituted a breach of trust giving rise to delictual liability to the capital beneficiaries.
  2. 2 Whether Absa Trust Limited is liable as successor for the delictual acts of Volkskas Limited or Volkskastrust Limited.
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiffs' claims are extinguished by prescription.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the sale of Erf 1604 in 1987 constituted a breach of trust, as it was effected for the benefit of an income beneficiary and disregarded the interests of the capital beneficiaries. However, the party responsible for the breach was Volkskastrust Limited, acting as agent for Volkskas Limited, the appointed trustee. Absa Trust Limited, although it succeeded Volkskastrust Limited in administering the trust, did not assume its delictual liabilities. Statutory amalgamation transferred such liabilities to Absa Bank Limited, not Absa Trust Limited. The representations made by Absa Trust Limited to the plaintiffs were limited to administrative succession and did not amount to...

Court Disposition

Action dismissed with costs, including costs of two counsel.

Orders

  • The action is dismissed with costs, including the costs of two counsel.