Louw and Others v Absa Trust Limited and Others (19085/2007) [2014] ZAWCHC 159 (28 October 2014)
The court found that the sale of Erf 1604 in 1987 constituted a breach of trust, as it was effected for the benefit of an income beneficiary and disregarded the interests of the capital beneficiaries. However, the party responsible for the breach was Volkskastrust Limited, acting as agent for Volkskas Limited, the appointed trustee. Absa Trust Limited, although it succeeded Volkskastrust Limited in administering the trust, did not assume its delictual liabilities. Statutory amalgamation transferred such liabilities to Absa Bank Limited, not Absa Trust Limited. The representations made by Absa Trust Limited to the plaintiffs were limited to administrative succession and did not amount to...
- Citation
- [2014] ZAWCHC 159
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Martin Ricciardi N.O.; Plaintiff: Ismail Shaik Hassan Parker N.O.; Plaintiff: Werner Francis Louw; Plaintiff: Wilhelm Jacques Louw; Defendant: Absa Trust Limited; Defendant: And Four Others
- Court
- Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 28 October 2014
- Case Number
- 19085/2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Trial / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Action dismissed with costs, including costs of two counsel.
- Judges
- Binns-Ward
- Legal Topics
- Testamentary Trusts, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Successor Liability, Prescription, Estoppel, Distribution of Trust Assets
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Martin Ricciardi N.O.
Plaintiff
Ismail Shaik Hassan Parker N.O.
Plaintiff
Werner Francis Louw
Plaintiff
Wilhelm Jacques Louw
Plaintiff
Absa Trust Limited
Defendant
And Four Others
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sale of Erf 1604 in 1987 by the trustee constituted a breach of trust giving rise to delictual liability to the capital beneficiaries.
- 2 Whether Absa Trust Limited is liable as successor for the delictual acts of Volkskas Limited or Volkskastrust Limited.
- 3 Whether the plaintiffs' claims are extinguished by prescription.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the sale of Erf 1604 in 1987 constituted a breach of trust, as it was effected for the benefit of an income beneficiary and disregarded the interests of the capital beneficiaries. However, the party responsible for the breach was Volkskastrust Limited, acting as agent for Volkskas Limited, the appointed trustee. Absa Trust Limited, although it succeeded Volkskastrust Limited in administering the trust, did not assume its delictual liabilities. Statutory amalgamation transferred such liabilities to Absa Bank Limited, not Absa Trust Limited. The representations made by Absa Trust Limited to the plaintiffs were limited to administrative succession and did not amount to...
Court Disposition
Action dismissed with costs, including costs of two counsel.
Orders
- The action is dismissed with costs, including the costs of two counsel.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment