Louw v Minister of Police (317/2019) [2023] ZANWHC 233 (12 October 2023)

Louw v Minister of Police (317/2019) [2023] ZANWHC 233 (12 October 2023)

The court found that the plaintiff suffered physical and psychological injuries after being shot by SAPS officers while not engaging in any unlawful conduct. Expert evidence confirmed post-traumatic stress disorder with depressive features and permanent scarring on both legs. The court distinguished the plaintiff's leg scars from facial scars in comparable cases, noting they are less visible but still cause discomfort and psychological impact. Considering the nature and permanence of the injuries, the emotional trauma, and comparable awards, the court determined that R300,000 is a fair and just amount for general damages. The agreed amount for future medical expenses was R261,656.96. The...

Citation
[2023] ZANWHC 233
Parties
Plaintiff: Adiliha Rigina Louw; Defendant: Minister of Police
Court
North West High Court, Mafikeng
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
12 October 2023
Case Number
317/2019
Procedural Posture
Delictual Claim / Quantum Determination After Liability Separated and Decided
Outcome
Plaintiff's claim for general damages and future medical expenses is upheld. Defendant is ordered to pay the total amount, interest, and costs.
Judges
Maakane
Legal Topics
Bodily Injury, General Damages, Quantum of Damages, Police Misconduct, Pain and Suffering
Delict Civil Procedure Bodily Injury General Damages Quantum of Damages Police Misconduct Pain and Suffering

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Adiliha Rigina Louw

Plaintiff

Minister of Police

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Delictual Claim / Quantum Determination After Liability Separated and Decided

Legal Issues

  1. 1 What is the appropriate quantum of general damages for the plaintiff's bodily injuries and psychological trauma resulting from being shot by SAPS officers.
  2. 2 Should the court award future medical expenses as agreed between the parties.
  3. 3 Is the plaintiff entitled to interest and costs, including expert costs.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff suffered physical and psychological injuries after being shot by SAPS officers while not engaging in any unlawful conduct. Expert evidence confirmed post-traumatic stress disorder with depressive features and permanent scarring on both legs. The court distinguished the plaintiff's leg scars from facial scars in comparable cases, noting they are less visible but still cause discomfort and psychological impact. Considering the nature and permanence of the injuries, the emotional trauma, and comparable awards, the court determined that R300,000 is a fair and just amount for general damages. The agreed amount for future medical expenses was R261,656.96. The...

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's claim for general damages and future medical expenses is upheld. Defendant is ordered to pay the total amount, interest, and costs.

Orders

  • Defendant is ordered to pay the plaintiff R561,656.96, comprising R261,656.96 for future medical expenses and R300,000 for general damages.
  • Defendant shall pay interest on R561,656.96 at 10% per annum from the date of judgment until payment.