Louw v W P (Kooperatief) Bpk. and Others (92/93) [1994] ZASCA 54; 1994 (3) SA 434 (AD); [1994] 2 All SA 366 (A) (30 March 1994)
The court held that the session agreement between the Koöperasie and the Land Bank was conditional, only transferring the right to enforce claims upon the occurrence of specified events under section 63(1) of the Land Bank Act. As none of these events had occurred, the Koöperasie retained locus standi to apply for sequestration of the appellant. The mutual intention of the parties, as evidenced by affidavits, confirmed that the session was not immediately operative. The appellant failed to demonstrate reasonable prospects of success on appeal, and his explanation for non-compliance with appellate rules was insufficient to justify condonation. The application for condonation was dismissed,...
- Citation
- [1994] ZASCA 54
- Parties
- Appellant: Coenraad Johannes Henoch Louw; Respondent: W P (Koöperatief) Beperk; Respondent: B Wallace N.O.; Respondent: Meester van die Hooggeregshof Kaap die Goeie Hoop; Respondent: M E van der Riet; Respondent: Land- en Landbou Bank van Suid-Afrika
- Court
- Supreme Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 30 March 1994
- Case Number
- 92/93
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal Against Refusal of Condonation and Locus Standi Determination
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; condonation application refused; costs awarded against appellant and his attorney.
- Judges
- Joubert, Hefer, Smalberger, F H Grosskopf, Howie
- Legal Topics
- Condonation, Locus Standi, Session of Claims, Securitatem Debiti, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Coenraad Johannes Henoch Louw
Appellant
W P (Koöperatief) Beperk
Respondent
B Wallace N.O.
Respondent
Meester van die Hooggeregshof Kaap die Goeie Hoop
Respondent
M E van der Riet
Respondent
Land- en Landbou Bank van Suid-Afrika
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Against Refusal of Condonation and Locus Standi Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant is entitled to condonation for late filing of the appeal record and failure to provide security for costs.
- 2 Whether the session agreement deprived the first respondent of locus standi to apply for sequestration of the appellant.
- 3 Whether the session agreement constituted a conditional cession under the Land Bank Act, and if so, whether the condition had been fulfilled.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the session agreement between the Koöperasie and the Land Bank was conditional, only transferring the right to enforce claims upon the occurrence of specified events under section 63(1) of the Land Bank Act. As none of these events had occurred, the Koöperasie retained locus standi to apply for sequestration of the appellant. The mutual intention of the parties, as evidenced by affidavits, confirmed that the session was not immediately operative. The appellant failed to demonstrate reasonable prospects of success on appeal, and his explanation for non-compliance with appellate rules was insufficient to justify condonation. The application for condonation was dismissed,...
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; condonation application refused; costs awarded against appellant and his attorney.
Orders
- The applications for condonation for late filing of the appeal record and exemption from providing security are dismissed with costs.
- The appellant's Cape Town attorney of record is ordered to pay two-thirds of the costs related to the condonation applications de bonis propriis, excluding costs of appearance in this court on 14 March 1994.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment