L.R v Road Accident Fund (153/2017) [2020] ZAFSHC 64 (19 March 2020)
The court found that the plaintiff failed to prove any past loss of income, as she received her salary during sick leave and did not establish a contractual entitlement to monetary compensation for lost sick leave. The plaintiff's resignation from PACOFS was primarily due to a salary dispute rather than accident-related incapacity, as confirmed by expert evidence and her employer's reports. The risks and profitability of her subsequent business venture are not attributable to the RAF. The court accepted the defendant's calculation for future loss of earning capacity, applying a 20% contingency deduction and ordering a section 17(4)(a) undertaking for the costs of hiring an assistant, as...
- Citation
- [2020] ZAFSHC 64
- Parties
- Plaintiff: LR; Defendant: Road Accident Fund
- Court
- Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 19 March 2020
- Case Number
- 153/2017
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Trial / Quantum Determination After Liability Established
- Outcome
- The plaintiff's claim for past loss of income is dismissed. The plaintiff is awarded compensation for future loss of earning capacity and general damages, and is granted a section 17(4)(a) undertaking for the costs of hiring an assistant. Costs are awarded to the plaintiff. The aspect of past medical expenses is...
- Judges
- Opperman, J
- Legal Topics
- Road Accident Fund Act, Loss of Earning Capacity, Section 17 Undertaking, Quantum of Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
LR
Plaintiff
Road Accident Fund
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Quantum Determination After Liability Established
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff proved past loss of income as a result of the accident.
- 2 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to future loss of earning capacity and the quantum thereof.
- 3 Whether the defendant's section 17(4)(a) undertaking for an assistant suffices to address the plaintiff's post-accident needs.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the plaintiff failed to prove any past loss of income, as she received her salary during sick leave and did not establish a contractual entitlement to monetary compensation for lost sick leave. The plaintiff's resignation from PACOFS was primarily due to a salary dispute rather than accident-related incapacity, as confirmed by expert evidence and her employer's reports. The risks and profitability of her subsequent business venture are not attributable to the RAF. The court accepted the defendant's calculation for future loss of earning capacity, applying a 20% contingency deduction and ordering a section 17(4)(a) undertaking for the costs of hiring an assistant, as...
Court Disposition
The plaintiff's claim for past loss of income is dismissed. The plaintiff is awarded compensation for future loss of earning capacity and general damages, and is granted a section 17(4)(a) undertaking for the costs of hiring an assistant. Costs are awarded to the plaintiff. The aspect of past medical expenses is...
Orders
- The defendant is to pay the plaintiff R800,000.00 in respect of general damages.
- The defendant is to pay the plaintiff R1,597,672.00 in respect of loss of income/loss of earning capacity.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment