Lungisa v African National Congress and Another (4211/2022) [2022] ZAECMKHC 111 (14 December 2022)

Lungisa v African National Congress and Another (4211/2022) [2022] ZAECMKHC 111 (14 December 2022)

The court found that the applicant failed to establish a prima facie right to the interim relief sought. The disciplinary proceedings and appeals within the ANC were conducted in accordance with the ANC Constitution, and the NDCA decision upholding the applicant's suspension was valid. The applicant's arguments regarding duplicative charges, lack of jurisdiction, and waiver were rejected on the facts and proper interpretation of the ANC Constitution. While the applicant may suffer harm if excluded from ANC activities, the balance of convenience did not favour granting interim relief given his weak prospects of success. The applicant had no other satisfactory remedy except to pursue...

Citation
[2022] ZAECMKHC 111
Parties
Applicant: Andile Lungisa; Respondent: African National Congress; Respondent: Members of the Eastern Cape Executive Committee of the African National Congress
Court
Eastern Cape High Court, Makhanda
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
14 December 2022
Case Number
4211/2022
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Application for Urgent Interim Interdict Pending Final Relief
Outcome
Application for urgent interim relief dismissed with costs, including costs of two counsel.
Judges
Lowe
Legal Topics
Interim Interdict, Association Rights, Disciplinary Proceedings, Bill of Rights Section 18, Internal Party Governance, Costs Award

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Andile Lungisa

Applicant

African National Congress

Respondent

Members of the Eastern Cape Executive Committee of the African National Congress

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Urgent Application / Application for Urgent Interim Interdict Pending Final Relief

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has established a prima facie right to urgent interim relief suspending his suspension from the ANC pending final determination.
  2. 2 Whether the disciplinary proceedings and appeals within the ANC were conducted in accordance with the ANC Constitution and principles of fairness.
  3. 3 Whether the applicant faces irreparable harm absent interim relief.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant failed to establish a prima facie right to the interim relief sought. The disciplinary proceedings and appeals within the ANC were conducted in accordance with the ANC Constitution, and the NDCA decision upholding the applicant's suspension was valid. The applicant's arguments regarding duplicative charges, lack of jurisdiction, and waiver were rejected on the facts and proper interpretation of the ANC Constitution. While the applicant may suffer harm if excluded from ANC activities, the balance of convenience did not favour granting interim relief given his weak prospects of success. The applicant had no other satisfactory remedy except to pursue...

Court Disposition

Application for urgent interim relief dismissed with costs, including costs of two counsel.

Orders

  • The application for urgent interim relief is dismissed.
  • Applicant is to pay first and second respondents' costs, including the costs of two counsel.