Lungisa v African National Congress and Another (4211/2022) [2022] ZAECMKHC 111 (14 December 2022)
The court found that the applicant failed to establish a prima facie right to the interim relief sought. The disciplinary proceedings and appeals within the ANC were conducted in accordance with the ANC Constitution, and the NDCA decision upholding the applicant's suspension was valid. The applicant's arguments regarding duplicative charges, lack of jurisdiction, and waiver were rejected on the facts and proper interpretation of the ANC Constitution. While the applicant may suffer harm if excluded from ANC activities, the balance of convenience did not favour granting interim relief given his weak prospects of success. The applicant had no other satisfactory remedy except to pursue...
- Citation
- [2022] ZAECMKHC 111
- Parties
- Applicant: Andile Lungisa; Respondent: African National Congress; Respondent: Members of the Eastern Cape Executive Committee of the African National Congress
- Court
- Eastern Cape High Court, Makhanda
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 14 December 2022
- Case Number
- 4211/2022
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Application for Urgent Interim Interdict Pending Final Relief
- Outcome
- Application for urgent interim relief dismissed with costs, including costs of two counsel.
- Judges
- Lowe
- Legal Topics
- Interim Interdict, Association Rights, Disciplinary Proceedings, Bill of Rights Section 18, Internal Party Governance, Costs Award
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Andile Lungisa
Applicant
African National Congress
Respondent
Members of the Eastern Cape Executive Committee of the African National Congress
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Application for Urgent Interim Interdict Pending Final Relief
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has established a prima facie right to urgent interim relief suspending his suspension from the ANC pending final determination.
- 2 Whether the disciplinary proceedings and appeals within the ANC were conducted in accordance with the ANC Constitution and principles of fairness.
- 3 Whether the applicant faces irreparable harm absent interim relief.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant failed to establish a prima facie right to the interim relief sought. The disciplinary proceedings and appeals within the ANC were conducted in accordance with the ANC Constitution, and the NDCA decision upholding the applicant's suspension was valid. The applicant's arguments regarding duplicative charges, lack of jurisdiction, and waiver were rejected on the facts and proper interpretation of the ANC Constitution. While the applicant may suffer harm if excluded from ANC activities, the balance of convenience did not favour granting interim relief given his weak prospects of success. The applicant had no other satisfactory remedy except to pursue...
Court Disposition
Application for urgent interim relief dismissed with costs, including costs of two counsel.
Orders
- The application for urgent interim relief is dismissed.
- Applicant is to pay first and second respondents' costs, including the costs of two counsel.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment