M & E Tools v Dave Sheer Gunsmithing and Firearms Exchange CC (70131/2011) [2014] ZAGPPHC 733 (26 September 2014)

M & E Tools v Dave Sheer Gunsmithing and Firearms Exchange CC (70131/2011) [2014] ZAGPPHC 733 (26 September 2014)

The court found that the contract between M & E Tools and Dave Sheer Gunsmithing and Firearms Exchange CC was illegal and void under section 13 of the National Conventional Arms Control Act, as the plaintiff did not possess the required permit. Both parties were in pari delicto, having entered into the agreement in ignorance of its illegality. However, the equities favoured the plaintiff, as the contract was cancelled for reasons unrelated to the illegality, and the defendant was unjustly enriched by retaining both the purchase price and the weapons. The court held that public policy justified relaxing the par delictum rule to prevent unjust enrichment and ordered restitution in favour of...

Citation
[2014] ZAGPPHC 733
Parties
Plaintiff: M & E Tools; Defendant: Dave Sheer Gunsmithing and Firearms Exchange CC
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
26 September 2014
Case Number
70131/2011
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Final Judgment
Outcome
Plaintiff's claim for restitution succeeds; defendant's counterclaim is dismissed.
Judges
P.A. Meyer
Legal Topics
Illegal Contract, Unjust Enrichment, Condictio Indebiti, Public Policy Exception, National Conventional Arms Control Act

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

M & E Tools

Plaintiff

Dave Sheer Gunsmithing and Firearms Exchange CC

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Trial / Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the contract between M & E Tools and Dave Sheer Gunsmithing and Firearms Exchange CC is illegal and void under section 13 of the National Conventional Arms Control Act.
  2. 2 Whether the maxim in pari delicto potior est conditio defendentis should be relaxed to allow the plaintiff to recover payments made under the illegal contract.
  3. 3 Whether the defendant has been unjustly enriched at the expense of the plaintiff.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the contract between M & E Tools and Dave Sheer Gunsmithing and Firearms Exchange CC was illegal and void under section 13 of the National Conventional Arms Control Act, as the plaintiff did not possess the required permit. Both parties were in pari delicto, having entered into the agreement in ignorance of its illegality. However, the equities favoured the plaintiff, as the contract was cancelled for reasons unrelated to the illegality, and the defendant was unjustly enriched by retaining both the purchase price and the weapons. The court held that public policy justified relaxing the par delictum rule to prevent unjust enrichment and ordered restitution in favour of...

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's claim for restitution succeeds; defendant's counterclaim is dismissed.

Orders

  • The defendant is to pay the sum of R567,306.40 to the plaintiff together with interest at 15.5% a tempore morae from 23 May 2013 until 31 July 2014 and at 9% a tempore morae from 1 August 2014 until date of payment.
  • The defendant is to pay the plaintiff's costs of suit as from 20 May 2013.