M N v Minister of Police (A5051/2019) [2020] ZAGPJHC 274 (19 October 2020)

M N v Minister of Police (A5051/2019) [2020] ZAGPJHC 274 (19 October 2020)

The court found that the trial judge had, during the course of the hearing and argument, clearly expressed his dissatisfaction with the agreements reached by the occupational therapists and industrial psychologists. The judge indicated that he was not bound by their opinions and invited the parties to adduce further...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] ZAGPJHC 274
Parties
Appellant: M N; Respondent: Minister of Police
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
19 October 2020
Case Number
A5051/2019
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Judgment and Order of Trial Court on Damages
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Judges
P.A. Meyer, Lamont, Harrison
Legal Topics
Damages Quantification, Expert Evidence, Future Medical Expenses, Joint Minutes, Threshold for Rejection of Expert Agreement
Delict Damages Quantification Expert Evidence Future Medical Expenses Joint Minutes Threshold for Rejection of Expert Agreement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

M N

Appellant

Minister of Police

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Judgment and Order of Trial Court on Damages

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the trial court met the threshold contemplated in Glen Mark Bee v Road Accident Fund for rejecting the agreement of occupational therapists without formally alerting the parties.
  2. 2 Whether the appellant was denied a fair opportunity to adduce further evidence after the trial court expressed dissatisfaction with the expert agreement.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the trial judge had, during the course of the hearing and argument, clearly expressed his dissatisfaction with the agreements reached by the occupational therapists and industrial psychologists. The judge indicated that he was not bound by their opinions and invited the parties to adduce further evidence if they wished. The court held that the requirements laid down in Glen Mark Bee v Road Accident Fund were met, as the parties were alerted to the judge's dissatisfaction and given the opportunity to respond. The appellant's contention that a formal warning was required was rejected. The appeal was dismissed as the trial court's approach complied with the applicable...

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed with costs.