M v Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service (14005) [2017] ZATC 1; 79 SATC 341 (30 May 2017)

M v Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service (14005) [2017] ZATC 1; 79 SATC 341 (30 May 2017)

The court held that the taxpayer's entitlement to payment under the contracts vested upon fulfilment of any suspensive conditions and the obtaining of statutory permissions necessary to tender transfer, whichever occurred later. For most transactions, this occurred before 31 March 2013, and thus the proceeds accrued in the 2013 tax year in accordance with the Lategan principle. However, even if actual accrual had not occurred, section 24(1) of the Income Tax Act deems the proceeds to have accrued on the date the agreements were entered into. The court found that section 24(1) applies to cash sales where transfer is passed against payment, as confirmed by the Appellate Division in...

Citation
[2017] ZATC 1
Parties
Appellant: M; Respondent: Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service
Court
Tax Court
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
30 May 2017
Case Number
14005
Procedural Posture
Tax Appeal / Final Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed. The Commissioner's assessment is upheld.
Judges
Binns-Ward, Y. Rybnikar, K. Hofmeyr
Legal Topics
Income Tax Accrual, Credit Agreements, Sale of Immovable Property, Timing of Gross Income, Statutory Interpretation
Tax Law Land and Property Income Tax Accrual Credit Agreements Sale of Immovable Property Timing of Gross Income Statutory Interpretation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

M

Appellant

Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Tax Appeal / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the purchase price consideration for immovable property sold by the taxpayer accrued in the 2013 tax year, despite payment being received only in the 2014 tax year.
  2. 2 Whether section 24(1) of the Income Tax Act deems the proceeds to have accrued in the 2013 tax year.
  3. 3 Whether the taxpayer's entitlement to payment vested before transfer and the satisfaction of statutory requirements.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the taxpayer's entitlement to payment under the contracts vested upon fulfilment of any suspensive conditions and the obtaining of statutory permissions necessary to tender transfer, whichever occurred later. For most transactions, this occurred before 31 March 2013, and thus the proceeds accrued in the 2013 tax year in accordance with the Lategan principle. However, even if actual accrual had not occurred, section 24(1) of the Income Tax Act deems the proceeds to have accrued on the date the agreements were entered into. The court found that section 24(1) applies to cash sales where transfer is passed against payment, as confirmed by the Appellate Division in...

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed. The Commissioner's assessment is upheld.

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed.
  • There is no order as to costs.