M v Ferreira and Others (01/03) [2004] ZAEQC 1 (7 April 2004)
The Equality Court, by agreement between the parties, found that the conduct of the first, second and third respondents constituted unfair discrimination, hate speech, and harassment on the ground of race, in contravention of the Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act. The respondents acknowledged the harm caused and tendered an unconditional apology, which was accepted by the applicant and her parents. The court ordered restorative measures, including diversity training for the respondents, payment to a community creche, and an audit of the school's policies. The fourth respondent consented to an audit without admission of liability, and the fifth respondent...
- Citation
- [2004] ZAEQC 1
- Parties
- Applicant: N M; Respondent: Shannon Ferreira; Respondent: Nameer Ferreira; Respondent: Byron Shaw; Respondent: Edgemead High School; Respondent: Provincial Minister for Education in the Western Cape
- Court
- Equality Court
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 7 April 2004
- Case Number
- 01/03
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Order Following Settlement and Amended Notice of Motion
- Outcome
- Order granted by agreement; apology tendered and accepted; restorative measures imposed; costs borne by each party; further relief postponed.
- Judges
- MM Dimbaza
- Legal Topics
- Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act, Hate Speech, Racial Discrimination, School Policy Audit, Damages for Dignity Impairment, Apology and Rehabilitation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
N M
Applicant
Shannon Ferreira
Respondent
Nameer Ferreira
Respondent
Byron Shaw
Respondent
Edgemead High School
Respondent
Provincial Minister for Education in the Western Cape
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Order Following Settlement and Amended Notice of Motion
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the conduct of the first, second and third respondents on 6 November 2003 constituted unfair discrimination, hate speech and harassment prohibited by the Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act.
- 2 Whether the applicant suffered impairment of dignity, pain, suffering, and emotional harm as a result of the respondents' conduct.
- 3 Whether the fourth respondent (school) and its officials unfairly discriminated against the applicant in their response to the incident.
Ratio Decidendi
The Equality Court, by agreement between the parties, found that the conduct of the first, second and third respondents constituted unfair discrimination, hate speech, and harassment on the ground of race, in contravention of the Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act. The respondents acknowledged the harm caused and tendered an unconditional apology, which was accepted by the applicant and her parents. The court ordered restorative measures, including diversity training for the respondents, payment to a community creche, and an audit of the school's policies. The fourth respondent consented to an audit without admission of liability, and the fifth respondent...
Court Disposition
Order granted by agreement; apology tendered and accepted; restorative measures imposed; costs borne by each party; further relief postponed.
Orders
- The Provincial Minister for Education in the Western Cape is joined as the fifth respondent.
- Applicant is given leave to amend her Notice of Motion.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment