Mabena v Mabena and Another (44038/2010) [2012] ZAGPPHC 21 (14 February 2012)

Mabena v Mabena and Another (44038/2010) [2012] ZAGPPHC 21 (14 February 2012)

The court found the Defendants' versions to be contradictory, inherently improbable, and unsupported by objective evidence. Their evidence was inconsistent with their pleadings, prior statements, and the objective medical evidence of the Plaintiff's injuries. The Plaintiff's evidence was corroborated by medical reports and was found credible. The court concluded that the Plaintiff was assaulted by the Defendants and others acting in concert, resulting in serious injury and loss. The Defendants failed to establish any lawful justification or self-defence. Accordingly, the Defendants are jointly and severally liable for the Plaintiff's damages, including loss of earnings and general damages...

Citation
[2012] ZAGPPHC 21
Parties
Plaintiff: Isaac Mabena; Defendant: Andrew Benjamin Mabena; Defendant: Zulu Boy Edward Mabena
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
14 February 2012
Case Number
44038/2010
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Judgment
Outcome
Plaintiff's claim for damages succeeded. Defendants held jointly and severally liable for loss of earnings and general damages, as well as costs.
Judges
P C Van der Byl
Legal Topics
Assault, Damages for Personal Injury, Loss of Earnings, General Damages, Credibility of Witnesses
Delict Assault Damages for Personal Injury Loss of Earnings General Damages Credibility of Witnesses

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Isaac Mabena

Plaintiff

Andrew Benjamin Mabena

Defendant

Zulu Boy Edward Mabena

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Trial / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Defendants wrongfully and unlawfully assaulted the Plaintiff.
  2. 2 Whether the Defendants are liable for the injuries and damages suffered by the Plaintiff.
  3. 3 Whether the Defendants acted in self-defence or were justified in their conduct.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found the Defendants' versions to be contradictory, inherently improbable, and unsupported by objective evidence. Their evidence was inconsistent with their pleadings, prior statements, and the objective medical evidence of the Plaintiff's injuries. The Plaintiff's evidence was corroborated by medical reports and was found credible. The court concluded that the Plaintiff was assaulted by the Defendants and others acting in concert, resulting in serious injury and loss. The Defendants failed to establish any lawful justification or self-defence. Accordingly, the Defendants are jointly and severally liable for the Plaintiff's damages, including loss of earnings and general damages...

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's claim for damages succeeded. Defendants held jointly and severally liable for loss of earnings and general damages, as well as costs.

Orders

  • The First and Second Defendants are ordered to pay, jointly and severally, the one paying the other to be absolved, to the Plaintiff: (a) in respect of loss of earnings, an amount of R3,783; (b) in respect of general damages, an amount of R80,000.
  • The First and Second Defendants are ordered to pay, jointly and severally, the one paying the other to be absolved, the Plaintiff's costs of the action.