Mabusela and Others v Booi and Another (CA149/2021) [2023] ZAECMKHC 54 (2 May 2023)
The court found that no valid agreement of sale was concluded between the parties for the property, as the respondents did not signify acceptance of the appellants' counter-offer for R515,000.00. The respondents' signatures on the initial offer to purchase for R450,000.00 could not denote acceptance of the amended purchase price. The appeal was held to have reasonable prospects of success, and in the interests of justice, condonation for the late filing of the appeal record and reinstatement of the appeal were granted. The order of the court a quo was set aside and substituted with an order discharging the rule nisi.
- Citation
- [2023] ZAECMKHC 54
- Parties
- Appellant: Mfundo Mabusela; Appellant: Thandeka Judith Mabusela (Nee Ngethu); Appellant: Amathuse Family Trust; Respondent: Bulelani Booi; Respondent: Zanda Booi
- Court
- Eastern Cape High Court, Makhanda
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 2 May 2023
- Case Number
- CA149/2021
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal Against Judgment and Order of Court a Quo; Applications for Condonation, Reinstatement, and Declaration of Lapse Considered
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; order of court a quo set aside and substituted; rule nisi discharged; costs awarded as specified.
- Judges
- N G Beshe, R W N Brooks, M Gwala
- Legal Topics
- Alienation of Land Act, Formalities of Contract, Condonation, Appeal Lapse, Offer and Acceptance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mfundo Mabusela
Appellant
Thandeka Judith Mabusela (Nee Ngethu)
Appellant
Amathuse Family Trust
Appellant
Bulelani Booi
Respondent
Zanda Booi
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Against Judgment and Order of Court a Quo; Applications for Condonation, Reinstatement, and Declaration of Lapse Considered
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a valid agreement of sale was concluded between the parties in compliance with section 2(1) of the Alienation of Land Act.
- 2 Whether the respondents accepted the appellants' counter-offer for the purchase price of R515,000.00.
- 3 Whether the appeal had lapsed due to procedural non-compliance and whether condonation and reinstatement should be granted.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that no valid agreement of sale was concluded between the parties for the property, as the respondents did not signify acceptance of the appellants' counter-offer for R515,000.00. The respondents' signatures on the initial offer to purchase for R450,000.00 could not denote acceptance of the amended purchase price. The appeal was held to have reasonable prospects of success, and in the interests of justice, condonation for the late filing of the appeal record and reinstatement of the appeal were granted. The order of the court a quo was set aside and substituted with an order discharging the rule nisi.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; order of court a quo set aside and substituted; rule nisi discharged; costs awarded as specified.
Orders
- The application for an order declaring that the appeal has lapsed is dismissed.
- The late filing of the appeal record is condoned.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment