Macassar Land Claims Committee v Maccsand CC and Others (LCC 37/2003) [2008] ZALCC 7 (1 February 2008)

Macassar Land Claims Committee v Maccsand CC and Others (LCC 37/2003) [2008] ZALCC 7 (1 February 2008)

The court held that the plaintiff's particulars of claim, as amended, must be assessed to determine whether they disclose a cause of action under the Restitution of Land Rights Act. The court found that certain defects identified by the defendants' exceptions were not cured by the amendments, and that some aspects of the claim remained vague and embarrassing. The court emphasized that the pleadings must clearly set out the factual and legal basis for restitution and the relief sought. The application for amendments was partially granted, but the exceptions were upheld in respect of those portions of the claim that remained defective. The plaintiff was afforded an opportunity to further...

Citation
[2008] ZALCC 7
Parties
Plaintiff: Macassar Land Claims Committee; Defendant: Maccsand CC; Defendant: Government of the Republic of South Africa; Defendant: Minister of Land Affairs; Defendant: City of Cape Town; Defendant: Minister of Local Government and Housing; Defendant: Regional Land Claims Commissioner; Defendant: Muslim Judicial Council; Defendant: Clive Aubrey Figaji; Defendant: Geoffreylane Figaji; Defendant: Marianna Loretta Figaji; Defendant: Philip James Figaji; Defendant: Registrar of Deeds; Defendant: Surveyor-General
Court
Land Claims Court
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
1 February 2008
Case Number
LCC 37/2003
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Exception and Amendment Application Prior to Trial
Outcome
Exceptions upheld in part; plaintiff granted leave to further amend particulars of claim.
Judges
Gildenhuys
Legal Topics
Restitution of Land Rights Act, Commonage Rights, Exception Procedure, Amendment of Pleadings
Land and Property Civil Procedure Restitution of Land Rights Act Commonage Rights Exception Procedure Amendment of Pleadings

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Macassar Land Claims Committee

Plaintiff

Maccsand CC

Defendant

Government of the Republic of South Africa

Defendant

Minister of Land Affairs

Defendant

City of Cape Town

Defendant

Minister of Local Government and Housing

Defendant

Regional Land Claims Commissioner

Defendant

Muslim Judicial Council

Defendant

Clive Aubrey Figaji

Defendant

Geoffreylane Figaji

Defendant

Marianna Loretta Figaji

Defendant

Philip James Figaji

Defendant

Registrar of Deeds

Defendant

Surveyor-General

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Trial / Exception and Amendment Application Prior to Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff's particulars of claim disclose a cause of action under the Restitution of Land Rights Act.
  2. 2 Whether the proposed amendments to the particulars of claim cure the defects identified by the defendants' exceptions.
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to restitution of commonage rights over the specified erven in Macassar.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the plaintiff's particulars of claim, as amended, must be assessed to determine whether they disclose a cause of action under the Restitution of Land Rights Act. The court found that certain defects identified by the defendants' exceptions were not cured by the amendments, and that some aspects of the claim remained vague and embarrassing. The court emphasized that the pleadings must clearly set out the factual and legal basis for restitution and the relief sought. The application for amendments was partially granted, but the exceptions were upheld in respect of those portions of the claim that remained defective. The plaintiff was afforded an opportunity to further...

Court Disposition

Exceptions upheld in part; plaintiff granted leave to further amend particulars of claim.

Orders

  • The exceptions to the particulars of claim are upheld in respect of the defective portions.
  • The plaintiff is granted leave to further amend the particulars of claim within a period specified by the court.