Machave and Another v Minister of Safety and Security (A437/12) [2014] ZAGPPHC 579 (17 July 2014)
The court found that the respondent discharged the onus of proving that the arrests and detention of the appellants were lawful under section 40(1)(a) and (b) of the Criminal Procedure Act, given the volatile and dangerous mob situation and the reasonable suspicion that the appellants were involved in public violence. However, the court held that the assaults perpetrated by the police during and after arrest were unlawful and unjustified. The evidence established that the appellants, along with other detainees including children, were subjected to degrading and inhumane treatment, including physical assaults, being ordered to lie down, having water poured over them, and being left in an...
- Citation
- [2014] ZAGPPHC 579
- Parties
- Appellant: Nevermind Machabe; Appellant: Eva Nkuna; Respondent: Minister of Safety and Security
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 17 July 2014
- Case Number
- A437/12
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Magistrate's Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed in respect of unlawful arrest and detention; appeal upheld in respect of unlawful assault. Respondent liable for costs.
- Judges
- Jansen, Mbha
- Legal Topics
- Unlawful Arrest, Unlawful Detention, Police Assault, Quantum of Damages, Onus of Proof, Reasonable Suspicion
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nevermind Machabe
Appellant
Eva Nkuna
Appellant
Minister of Safety and Security
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Magistrate's Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the arrest and detention of the appellants by the police was lawful.
- 2 Whether the appellants were unlawfully assaulted by members of the South African Police Services during arrest and detention.
- 3 Whether the magistrate erred in dismissing the claims for assault and unlawful arrest.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the respondent discharged the onus of proving that the arrests and detention of the appellants were lawful under section 40(1)(a) and (b) of the Criminal Procedure Act, given the volatile and dangerous mob situation and the reasonable suspicion that the appellants were involved in public violence. However, the court held that the assaults perpetrated by the police during and after arrest were unlawful and unjustified. The evidence established that the appellants, along with other detainees including children, were subjected to degrading and inhumane treatment, including physical assaults, being ordered to lie down, having water poured over them, and being left in an...
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed in respect of unlawful arrest and detention; appeal upheld in respect of unlawful assault. Respondent liable for costs.
Orders
- The appeal in respect of the unlawful arrest and detention of the appellants is dismissed.
- The appeal in respect of the unlawful and wrongful assault of Nevermind Machabe and Eva Nkuna is upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment