Madida obo S.S.M v MEC for Health for the Province of KwaZulu-Natal (14275/2014) [2016] ZAKZPHC 27 (14 March 2016)
The court found that the defendant's employees failed to follow established medical protocols for managing a high-risk labour, including the absence of a medical officer at critical times and inappropriate application of fundal pressure. The hospital records, which were under the defendant's control, demonstrated that the plaintiff was a primagravida teenager of short stature, presenting a high-risk labour that required medical intervention. The failure to intervene resulted in hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy and severe disabilities for the child. The defendant's inability to provide a substantive defence or timely engage experts, coupled with statutory and professional breaches in...
- Citation
- [2016] ZAKZPHC 27
- Parties
- Applicant: Nompumelelo Polite Madida (obo S.S.M); Respondent: MEC for Health for the Province of KwaZulu-Natal
- Court
- Kwazulu-Natal High Court, Pietermaritzburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 14 March 2016
- Case Number
- 14275/2014
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Trial / Liability and Costs; Quantum Postponed
- Outcome
- The defendant is liable for damages arising from medical negligence, subject to proof of quantum. Costs to date are awarded to the plaintiff on a party and party scale, including specified expert and preparation costs.
- Judges
- D Pillay
- Legal Topics
- Medical Negligence, Hospital Records Preservation, Causation in Birth Injury, Costs Award, Statutory Duties of Health Professionals
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nompumelelo Polite Madida (obo S.S.M)
Applicant
MEC for Health for the Province of KwaZulu-Natal
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Liability and Costs; Quantum Postponed
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant's employees were negligent in the management of the plaintiff's labour and delivery, resulting in cerebral palsy and related injuries to the child.
- 2 Whether the defendant failed in its statutory and professional duty to preserve and provide hospital records.
- 3 Whether the defendant is liable for damages arising from medical negligence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the defendant's employees failed to follow established medical protocols for managing a high-risk labour, including the absence of a medical officer at critical times and inappropriate application of fundal pressure. The hospital records, which were under the defendant's control, demonstrated that the plaintiff was a primagravida teenager of short stature, presenting a high-risk labour that required medical intervention. The failure to intervene resulted in hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy and severe disabilities for the child. The defendant's inability to provide a substantive defence or timely engage experts, coupled with statutory and professional breaches in...
Court Disposition
The defendant is liable for damages arising from medical negligence, subject to proof of quantum. Costs to date are awarded to the plaintiff on a party and party scale, including specified expert and preparation costs.
Orders
- The defendant is liable to pay the plaintiff for such damages as she is able to prove in due course.
- The defendant is ordered to pay the plaintiff’s costs to date (including the costs of the formal application for the adjournment of the trial) on the scale as between party and party; such costs to include the costs of both senior and junior counsel, their fees for preparation for the trial, the opposed application,...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment