Mafoko and Another v VBS Mutual Bank (In Liquidation) (2021/34634) [2023] ZAGPJHC 536 (29 May 2023)
The court found that the applicants failed to demonstrate a reasonable prospect of success on appeal. The main judgment had comprehensively addressed all complaints raised, including the sufficiency of the founding affidavit, the treatment of new matter in the replying affidavit, and the establishment of the quantum of indebtedness. The applicants did not effectively challenge the principal debtor's liability or the supporting documentation. The court noted that the applicants did not seek to cure any alleged prejudice by requesting a postponement or leave to file a supplementary affidavit. However, compelling reasons were advanced for clarification by a superior court on specific legal...
- Citation
- [2023] ZAGPJHC 536
- Parties
- Applicant: Itumeleng Mafoko; Applicant: Mabuyi Rowena Memela; Respondent: VBS Mutual Bank (In Liquidation)
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 29 May 2023
- Case Number
- 2021/34634
- Procedural Posture
- Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Judgment and Order Handed Down on 9 February 2023
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeal is granted. Costs of the application for leave to appeal are costs in the cause of the appeal.
- Judges
- Maier-Frawley
- Legal Topics
- Suretyship Enforcement, Leave to Appeal Threshold, Audi Alteram Partem, Hearsay Evidence, Contractual Liability
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Itumeleng Mafoko
Applicant
Mabuyi Rowena Memela
Applicant
VBS Mutual Bank (In Liquidation)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Judgment and Order Handed Down on 9 February 2023
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appeal would have a reasonable prospect of success or if there are compelling reasons for leave to appeal to be granted.
- 2 Whether the lack of objection in the answering affidavit cures alleged defects in the founding papers and reliance on hearsay evidence.
- 3 Whether the court erred by considering new matter raised in the replying affidavit and by granting condonation for its late filing without affording the sureties an opportunity to respond.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants failed to demonstrate a reasonable prospect of success on appeal. The main judgment had comprehensively addressed all complaints raised, including the sufficiency of the founding affidavit, the treatment of new matter in the replying affidavit, and the establishment of the quantum of indebtedness. The applicants did not effectively challenge the principal debtor's liability or the supporting documentation. The court noted that the applicants did not seek to cure any alleged prejudice by requesting a postponement or leave to file a supplementary affidavit. However, compelling reasons were advanced for clarification by a superior court on specific legal...
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeal is granted. Costs of the application for leave to appeal are costs in the cause of the appeal.
Orders
- Leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeal is granted.
- The costs of the application for leave to appeal are costs in the cause of the appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment