Download PDF

South Africa Ruling

National Consumer Tribunal

Magaya and Another v First National Bank a Division of Firstrand Bank Limited and Another (NCT/133952/2019/165) [2019] ZANCT 148 (9 September 2019)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The Tribunal was satisfied that all parties were properly notified of the hearing date, time, and venue. In accordance with Rule 24 of the National Consumer Tribunal Rules, the application was dismissed due to the non-appearance of the applicant, consumer, and respondents. The Tribunal confirmed that no substantive arguments or evidence were presented, and the dismissal was issued ex tempore on the record. There was no order as to costs.

Court disposition

Application dismissed for non-appearance; no order as to costs.

Orders

  • The application lodged in terms of Section 165 of the National Credit Act is dismissed.
  • There is no order as to costs.

02

Material facts

Parties

Evericious Magaya

Applicant

Nellia Dube

Applicant

First National Bank a Division of Firstrand Bank Limited

Respondent

Nedbank Limited

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Review Application / Application for Variation of Debt Re Arrangement Order Under Section 165 of the National Credit Act; Hearing Dismissed for Non Appearance.

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicant sought to vary the previously confirmed debt re-arrangement order, alleging that the repayment terms and concession period for Nedbank Limited were not as per the acceptance letter. No further argument was presented due to non-appearance.
Respondent
No arguments were presented by the respondents as neither they nor their representatives appeared at the hearing.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Rule 24 of the National Consumer Tribunal Rules (GN 789 of 28 August 2007, as amended)

    If an applicant fails to attend or be represented at any hearing, the presiding member may dismiss the matter by issuing a written ruling, provided the party was properly notified.

  2. 02

    Rule 24(2) of the National Consumer Tribunal Rules

    The presiding member must be satisfied that the parties were properly notified of the date, time, and venue of the proceedings before making any decision to dismiss.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The Tribunal was satisfied that all parties were properly notified of the hearing date, time, and venue. In accordance with Rule 24 of the National Consumer Tribunal Rules, the application was dismissed due to the non-appearance of the applicant, consumer, and respondents. The Tribunal confirmed that no substantive arguments or evidence were presented, and the dismissal was issued ex tempore on the record. There was no order as to costs.

Obiter and limits

  • The Tribunal reiterates the importance of parties attending hearings to ensure that their interests are properly represented and adjudicated.
  • The dismissal of the application does not affect the previously confirmed debt re-arrangement order.

Court disposition

Application dismissed for non-appearance; no order as to costs.

  • The application lodged in terms of Section 165 of the National Credit Act is dismissed.
  • There is no order as to costs.

Source and reliance status

National Consumer Tribunal

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

National Consumer Tribunal

Ruling

[2019] ZANCT 148

SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy

IN

THE NATIONAL CONSUMER TRIBUNAL

HELD

IN CENTURION

Case Number: NCT/133952/2019/165

In the matter between:

EVERCIOUS

MAGAYA APPLICANT

NCRDC 2449

And

NELLIA

DUBE CONSUMER

ID NO: […]

FIRST NATIONAL BANK A DIVISION OF FIRSTRAND 1ST

RESPONDENT

BANK

LIMITED

NEDBANK LIMITED 2ND

RESPONDENT

Coram:

Ms H Devraj – Presiding member

Adv F Manamela – Tribunal Member

Ms N Maseti – Tribunal Member

Date of hearing – 5 September 2019

RULING

AND REASONS

APPLICANT

1. The Applicant is Evericious Magaya, a debt counsellor registered in accordance with the National Credit Act 34 of 2005 (“the Act”) (the “Applicant”).

CONSUMER

AND RESPONDENTS

2. The Consumer is Nellia Dube, who is under debt review. The First and Second Respondents are registered with the National Credit Regulator as credit providers (hereinafter all the Respondents are collectively referred to as “the Respondents”).

BACKGROUND

3. On 22 May 2019; the debt re-arrangement agreement between the Consumer and the First and Second Respondents was confirmed as an order of the Tribunal as per case number NCT/129939/2019/138(1).

4. On 25 June 2019; the Applicant lodged an application with the Tribunal in terms of Section 165 of the Act to have the order varied.

5. The basis of the Application is that the repayment terms and the concession period for Nedbank Limited; was not as per the acceptance letter.

6. The notice of set down was issued by the Registrar on 26 July 2019 for the hearing on 5 September 2019.

7. On the date of the hearing there was no appearance by the Applicant, the Consumer, or any of the Respondents.

DISMISSAL

OF APPLICATION

8. As stated above there was no appearance by the Applicant, Consumer or the Respondents or any representative on the date of the hearing.

9. Rule 24 of the National Consumer Tribunal Rules[1] provides that:

“Non- appearance

(1) If a party to a matter fails to attend or be represented at any hearing or any proceedings, and that party-

(a) is the applicant, the presiding member may dismiss the matter by issuing a

written ruling; or

(b) is not the applicant, the presiding member may-

(i) continue with the proceedings in the absence of that party; or

(ii) adjourn the hearing to a later date

(2) The Presiding member must be satisfied that the party had been properly notified of the date, time and venue of the proceedings, before making any decision in terms of subrule (1)

(3) If a matter is dismissed, the Registrar must send a copy of the ruling to the parties.”

10. The Presiding Member of the Tribunal was satisfied that the parties were properly notified of the date, time and venue for the proceedings.

11. The application was then formally dismissed by the Tribunal on record – ex tempore.

ORDER

12. Accordingly, the Tribunal hereby confirms the ex-tempore order issued at the hearing stating that:

12.1 The application lodged in terms of Section 165 of the Act is hereby dismissed; and

12.2 There is no order as to costs.

DATED ON THIS 9th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2019

[signed]

Ms. H Devraj

Presiding Member

Adv F Manamela (Tribunal member) and Ms N Maseti (Tribunal member) concurring

[1] GN 789 of 28 August 2007: Regulations for matters relating to the functions of the Tribunal and Rules for the conduct of matters before the National Consumer Tribunal, 2007 (Government Gazette No. 30225) - as amended by Government Gazette Date GN 428 Notice 34405 of 29 June 2011 and Government Gazette GNR.203 Notice 38557 of 13 March 2015

[1] GN 789 of 28 August 2007: Regulations for matters relating to the functions of the Tribunal and Rules for the conduct of matters before the National Consumer Tribunal, 2007 (Government Gazette No. 30225) -

as amended by Government Gazette Date GN 428 Notice 34405 of 29 June 2011 and Government Gazette GNR.203 Notice 38557 of 13 March 2015

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

National Credit Act 34 of 2005

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

GN 789 of 28 August 2007: Regulations for matters relating to the functions of the Tribunal and Rules for the conduct of matters before the National Consumer Tribunal, 2007

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.