Magubane v Mercedes-Benz Financial Services SA (18287/2014) [2014] ZAGPPHC 691 (8 September 2014)

Magubane v Mercedes-Benz Financial Services SA (18287/2014) [2014] ZAGPPHC 691 (8 September 2014)

The court found, after reconsidering its judgment and the arguments presented, that there is no reasonable possibility that another court would reach a different conclusion on the facts. Accordingly, the application for leave to appeal must be dismissed.

Citation
[2014] ZAGPPHC 691
Parties
Applicant: Jabulani Magubane; Respondent: Mercedes-Benz Financial Services SA
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
8 September 2014
Case Number
18287/2014
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal After Judgment
Outcome
Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
Judges
C Pretorius
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal, Costs Order
Civil Procedure Leave to Appeal Costs Order

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jabulani Magubane

Applicant

Mercedes-Benz Financial Services SA

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal After Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether there is a reasonable prospect that another court would come to a different conclusion on the facts.
  2. 2 Whether leave to appeal should be granted.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found, after reconsidering its judgment and the arguments presented, that there is no reasonable possibility that another court would reach a different conclusion on the facts. Accordingly, the application for leave to appeal must be dismissed.

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs.