Mahikeng Local Municipality v Gwiriri and Others (UM157/2019) [2023] ZANWHC 132 (10 August 2023)
The court found that the applicant had previously obtained an order interdicting the respondents from invading, allocating, or selling stands on the specified land, and that order was never appealed and remains valid. The second respondent's denial of allocating or selling stands since the 2019 order was fatal to...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] ZANWHC 132
- Parties
- Applicant: Mahikeng Local Municipality; Respondent: Velaphi Gwiriri; Respondent: Chris Mosiane; Respondent: David Mbochela; Respondent: Faraki Lefini; Respondent: Any other individual who associates themselves with the unlawful conduct of the first to fourth respondents; Respondent: The Provincial Commissioner of Police: North West Province; Respondent: The Station Commander, Mahikeng Police Station
- Court
- North West High Court, Mafikeng
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 10 August 2023
- Case Number
- UM157/2019
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Order Confirming Rule Nisi and Costs
- Outcome
- Rule nisi confirmed; second respondent ordered to pay costs.
- Judges
- J T Djaje
- Legal Topics
- Interdict, Unlawful Occupation, Rule Nisi, Costs Order
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mahikeng Local Municipality
Applicant
Velaphi Gwiriri
Respondent
Chris Mosiane
Respondent
David Mbochela
Respondent
Faraki Lefini
Respondent
Any other individual who associates themselves with the unlawful conduct of the first to fourth respondents
Respondent
The Provincial Commissioner of Police: North West Province
Respondent
The Station Commander, Mahikeng Police Station
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Order Confirming Rule Nisi and Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondents should be interdicted from allocating, selling or alienating land on Portion 2 of the Farm Rooigrond No. 135 and Remainder of Erf 428, Mahikeng.
- 2 Whether the second respondent is in breach of the previous court order prohibiting allocation or sale of stands.
- 3 Whether there is a valid dispute of ownership affecting the applicant's entitlement to relief.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant had previously obtained an order interdicting the respondents from invading, allocating, or selling stands on the specified land, and that order was never appealed and remains valid. The second respondent's denial of allocating or selling stands since the 2019 order was fatal to his defence, as he failed to provide any evidence of a pending ownership dispute or authority from the Traditional Council. The absence of proof and the standing court order justified the confirmation of the rule nisi and the award of costs against the second respondent.
Court Disposition
Rule nisi confirmed; second respondent ordered to pay costs.
Orders
- The rule nisi is confirmed.
- The second respondent is ordered to pay the costs of the application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment